![]() |
315mhz/433mhz transmitter
In article , John S wrote:
Should we take this somewhere else? I wonder if anyone else is interested. Maybe Rob? What do you think? If it benefits only three people, is it worth it? I'm definitely interested, and I think it's sufficiently on-topic for this newsgroup that it's quite reasonable to continue the discussion here. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
315mhz/433mhz transmitter
On 7/24/2012 3:52 PM, John S wrote:
On 7/24/2012 3:37 PM, John S wrote: I'm enjoying this, Jeff. Finally, I have someone with which to kick this around and learn something. I'd really like to get to the bottom of this whole thing. Should we take this somewhere else? I wonder if anyone else is interested. Maybe Rob? What do you think? If it benefits only three people, is it worth it? I find it very useful since I am interested in the low (weak signal) end of 70cm. Don't assume that because we aren't poking our noses in that there aren't interested people out here. Please carry on where I can see it. I've always wondered if the imported 433MHz devices were running legally. tom K0TAR |
315mhz/433mhz transmitter
On 7/24/2012 6:33 PM, tom wrote:
On 7/24/2012 3:52 PM, John S wrote: On 7/24/2012 3:37 PM, John S wrote: I'm enjoying this, Jeff. Finally, I have someone with which to kick this around and learn something. I'd really like to get to the bottom of this whole thing. Should we take this somewhere else? I wonder if anyone else is interested. Maybe Rob? What do you think? If it benefits only three people, is it worth it? I find it very useful since I am interested in the low (weak signal) end of 70cm. Don't assume that because we aren't poking our noses in that there aren't interested people out here. Please carry on where I can see it. I've always wondered if the imported 433MHz devices were running legally. tom K0TAR Thanks for your inputs, guys. I probably can't do it alone, so I will be counting on Jeff for some leadership here. John KD5YI |
315mhz/433mhz transmitter
In message , Jeff Liebermann
writes My guess(tm) is that the higher power 433MHz devices can only be sold in Europe. Yet, that's not apparent on any of the sites selling 433MHz data radios. It's unlikely that any high power short-range devices are legally on sale in Europe. The UK spec is 10mW erp (which is probably the norm). http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/bin...m-policy-area/ spectrum-management/research-guidelines-tech-info/interface-requirements/ IR_2030.pdf page 17. Of course, over here, 70cm is only 430 to 440MHz, and (for various reasons) most of the simplex activity is 432 to 434MHz. An SRD allocation at 433MHz can cause some interesting problems - especially to car key systems which, in the past, have often had fairly 'elementary' and unselective receivers. It is said that great fun can be had when you're sitting in your car in the shopping mall carpark, waiting for your wife to emerge from the shops. -- Ian |
315mhz/433mhz transmitter
On 7/23/2012 11:21 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 08:56:41 -0500, John S wrote: On 7/23/2012 1:28 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 23:21:12 -0700, Jeff Liebermann wrote: FCC 15.209 http://louise.hallikainen.org/FCC/FccRules/2012/15/209/ 200 uv/meter maximum, measured at 3 meters. That works out to about -46dBm ERP or about 12 milliwatts into a unity gain antenna. Sorry, brain damage. The -46dBm should be 10.8dBm ERP Hmmm... my calculator says P = 12 nanowatts. Your calculator is correct. My -46dBm is wrong. It was late, I was multitasking, the phone range, I was tired, etc. Sorry for the muddle. +10.8dBm converts to 12 mw. http://www.rapidtables.com/convert/power/dBm_to_mW.htm Then... I find a 433MHz radio that delivers +20dBm (100mw). http://www.sparkfun.com/products/10153 By my reading of 15.209, that's overpowered unless operating with a miserable -9dB gain antenna. From the manufacturers web pile at: http://www.hoperf.com/rf_fsk/ they offer +10, +13, and +20dBm outputs and claim they all meet ETSI and FCC regs. I dunno about that. I looked at one of the Hoperf parts and found this: "The RFM69H is intended for applications over a wide frequency range, including the 433 MHz and 868 MHz European and the 902-928 MHz North American ISM bands." That's the catch. Although it is capable of operating at 10dBm on 433, you are responsible for only doing that in Europe where it is legal. Otherwise, you may operate it at its maximum power capability here in the US on 915MHz. Under those conditions, it complies with FCC regs. |
315mhz/433mhz transmitter
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:40:42 -0500, John S
wrote: Thanks for your inputs, guys. I probably can't do it alone, so I will be counting on Jeff for some leadership here. I'll try, but I'm a bit busy with work right now. I'll get back to this in the next day or two, and when I get some replies to several emails. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
315mhz/433mhz transmitter
On 7/25/2012 8:47 AM, John S wrote:
On 7/23/2012 11:21 AM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: Then... I find a 433MHz radio that delivers +20dBm (100mw). http://www.sparkfun.com/products/10153 By my reading of 15.209, that's overpowered unless operating with a miserable -9dB gain antenna. From the manufacturers web pile at: http://www.hoperf.com/rf_fsk/ they offer +10, +13, and +20dBm outputs and claim they all meet ETSI and FCC regs. I dunno about that. I looked at one of the Hoperf parts and found this: "The RFM69H is intended for applications over a wide frequency range, including the 433 MHz and 868 MHz European and the 902-928 MHz North American ISM bands." That's the catch. Although it is capable of operating at 10dBm on 433, you are responsible for only doing that in Europe where it is legal. Otherwise, you may operate it at its maximum power capability here in the US on 915MHz. Under those conditions, it complies with FCC regs. Continuing the investigation, I find that the US has no ISM band anywhere near 433MHz. The closest is 915MHz. Interestingly, on that band, the FCC says: "§ 18.305 Field strength limits. (a) ISM equipment operating on a fre- quency specified in § 18.301 is permitted unlimited radiated energy in the band specified for that frequency." Wow! Unlimited! The catch is that you may have no emissions outside the ISM bands exceeding 25uV/m at 300m. That would be equivalent of less than 2 microwatts of 2nd, 3rd,.... etc, harmonics and other stuff being radiated by the antenna. That, I think, would be about -37dBc when running 10mW. The more power you run, the harder it gets to filter. In addition, I still have some questions in my mind about certification. Just because a manufacturer says it will meet the requirements, doesn't necessarily mean it is certificated. Part 15 (not ISM) allows us to build our own transmitters which are not for sale. But, I can find no mention of that in part 18 (ISM). Still lots of questions out there. |
315mhz/433mhz transmitter
On 7/25/2012 12:03 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 18:40:42 -0500, John S wrote: Thanks for your inputs, guys. I probably can't do it alone, so I will be counting on Jeff for some leadership here. I'll try, but I'm a bit busy with work right now. I'll get back to this in the next day or two, and when I get some replies to several emails. Of course. Work comes first. |
315mhz/433mhz transmitter
ungli jigal talks about the story of four years life "Engineering Student"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-MweIUKAig subscribe for more footages |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com