Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 13:07:13 -0500, W5DXP
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: Your failure to confirm or respond to Walt's second correction offers compelling further evidence that you are an unreliable correspondent. Actually, it confirms that I am a polite correspondent. Walt and I are discussing this in private email. So this makes the third occurence. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cecil's Math a Blunder? | Antenna | |||
Cecil's Math | Antenna |