Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K7JEB wrote in message . ..
On 12 Jun 2004 16:43:35 -0700, (David Harper) wrote: I had a simple question in regards to phased array antenna patterns. If a phased array is trying to send a narrow beam in a specific direction, how do the other side lobes get reduced and/or eliminated? Are the individual antenna transmitters/elements not omnidirectional themselves? If not, what are the characteristics of their patterns? There's really nothing special about a phased-array antenna. It is a radiating aperture, just like the mouth of a horn or the front of a parabolic "dish". The only difference is that the phase and amplitude of the excitation across the aperture can be much more finely adjusted to "squint" the beam. But the essential tradeoff remains: the larger the aperture, the narrower the beam. And, like horns and reflectors, one can reduce the sidelobes by not exciting the outside elements as strongly, but with a corresponding reduction in gain from the maximum obtainable for a given aperture size. This is called illumination tapering and is done on all antennas in one form or another to work the gain/sidelobe tradeoff. I ask this because I'm trying to understand how tracking radars can send narrow beams in the desired direction without significant secondary lobes to interfere with returns from the desired lobe. Most radars go for wider beams with lower sidelobes because the overall system performance is better. But the sidelobes are only reduced, not eliminated entirely. Oh, yeah, and about the patterns of the individual elements, they have to be as non-directional as possible. The deal is that the overall antenna pattern is the result of the PRODUCT of the array factor with the pattern of the individual elements. If the individual elements have reduced gain off boresight, the entire antenna gain is reduced off-boresight as well, limiting the angles at which the beam may be "squinted". Jim, K7JEB Thanks! You know any simple phased array configurations that are easy to mathmatically model? I've played with a 4-element array all located on the same axis just for fun to see what resulted (and to make sure my equations were right), but I'd like to find some real-world systems (hopefully without too many elements) to play with. Any digrams exist on the net? (dimensional relationship between elements, etc). Thanks again! Dave |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |