Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 8th 03, 07:53 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:09:01 -0400, "WB3FUP \(Mike Hall\)"
wrote:

And another good reason the folded dipole FM antenna works so great. There
is actually science to support use of a 300 ohm antenna. who'd a thunk it.


Hi Mike,

What you describe is the feedpoint Z not the antenna Z which to all
intents and purposes is not far from the original, single-wire dipole.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 8th 03, 09:17 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tricky Dick Sez -
What you describe is the feedpoint Z not the antenna Z which to all
intents and purposes is not far from the original, single-wire dipole.


Tricky,
After all these years you're catching on. What you really meant to say was
that the feedpoint impedance is not the same thing as the radiation
resistance.

'Antenna' impedance' in the present context is not a phrase known to radio
engineering. Please define.
---
Reg


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017