Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:09:01 -0400, "WB3FUP \(Mike Hall\)"
wrote: And another good reason the folded dipole FM antenna works so great. There is actually science to support use of a 300 ohm antenna. who'd a thunk it. Hi Mike, What you describe is the feedpoint Z not the antenna Z which to all intents and purposes is not far from the original, single-wire dipole. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tricky Dick Sez -
What you describe is the feedpoint Z not the antenna Z which to all intents and purposes is not far from the original, single-wire dipole. Tricky, After all these years you're catching on. What you really meant to say was that the feedpoint impedance is not the same thing as the radiation resistance. 'Antenna' impedance' in the present context is not a phrase known to radio engineering. Please define. --- Reg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |