LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old August 9th 03, 09:57 PM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

William E. Sabin wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote:

Only at some distance from the antenna. You can create local E/H
ratios of nearly any value (magnitude and phase).

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

W5DXP wrote:


The ratio of the radiated E-field to H-field has no other choice.
If you stuff EM radiation into free space, the ratio of E-field to
H-field is 376.7 ohms. Zero energy is lost from the EM spectrum when
an electron throws off a photon (until that photon is annihilated).





The near field has a reactive component to the impedance. But is it true
that the real part of that complex impedance must be 376.7 ohms resistive?

Bill W0IYH


Not at all. For example, the magnitude of of the wave impedance E/H is
much lower than 377 ohms very close to a small loop, and much higher
than 377 ohms very close to a short dipole. Interestingly, as you move
away from a small loop, the magnitude of E/H actually increases to a
value greater than 377 ohms, then slowly approaches 377 ohms from the
high side as you move even farther away. The opposite happens for a
short dipole -- the E/H ratio drops below 377 ohms some distance away (a
fraction of a wavelength), then increases to 377 ohms as you go farther yet.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017