LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old August 10th 03, 05:00 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 10 Aug 2003 08:54:56 -0500, "William E. Sabin"
sabinw@mwci-news wrote:

It seems that very close to (but slightly removed
from) the antenna the real part of the resistive
space impedance is nearly the same as the real
part of the driving point impedance of the
antenna. This real part is then transformed to 377
ohms (real) within the near field, suggesting that
the open space adjacent to the antenna performs an
impedance transformation. The near-field reactive
fields perform this function in some manner.


The figures at:
http://home.comcast.net/~kb7qhc/ante...pole/index.htm
illustrate just how the dipole's near-field reactance maps out
(without respect for phase, and expressed in SWR relative to free
space Z).

Note that employing the term transform and antenna within the same
context is not de rigueur. ;-)

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017