Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Richard Clark wrote in message . ..
It leaves open the question as to how does one know whether two things with the same units are the same (or not); a much more challenging problem, I suspect. ...Keith You will note that this bears no relation to ohms being different, because as you observed with the horsepower example, it is simply flipping through translations until you hit the units you want. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC I don't think anyone here is arguing that a wave traveling through a transmission line is the same as an EM wave traveling through free-space. But as Richard has shown, the units are always the same, as they should be. Just like a meter is still a meter, whether it is in torque or work. But it tells you something about what you are measuring, and the clue is that the E field is defined by the voltage potential field, and the H field by amps (turns). And if the permittivity (impedance) of the material surrounding an antenna will affect it's input impedance, i think it's something to consider. Slick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dr. Slick wrote:
"And if the permittivity (impedance) of the material surrounding an antenna will affect its input impedance, I think it is something to consider." The permittivity surrounding our antennas rarely changes and is the same for nearly all antennas. My dictionary says of permittivity: "See Dielectric Constant". Velocity can be affected by dielectric constant as is seen in solid-dielectric coax. Fortunately, the dielectric constant of the environment our antennas operate in is nearly constant. Were matching antennas to 377 ohms significant, it would manifest itself in the century of experience of using many antennas of many differing types. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |