Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:53:34 GMT, Gene Nygaard
wrote: I will bet that Richard Clark won't endorse your finding as being any sort of "official definition." What do you say, Richard? Did he find a hidden treasure? Hi Gene, You haven't got it yet? I don't care. :-) Your correspondence with its one note tune reminds me of the couplet about fleas "and fleas have littler fleas, and so on ad infinitum" 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:38:03 GMT, Richard Clark
wrote: On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:53:34 GMT, Gene Nygaard wrote: I will bet that Richard Clark won't endorse your finding as being any sort of "official definition." What do you say, Richard? Did he find a hidden treasure? Hi Gene, You haven't got it yet? I don't care. :-) Gee, I forgot. I suppose 14 responses are pretty good evidence of how little you do care. If anybody actually does come up with an official definition, you'll be latching onto it like a fly onto ****. Gene Nygaard http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:51:55 GMT, Gene Nygaard
wrote: You haven't got it yet? I don't care. :-) Gee, I forgot. If anybody actually does come up with an official definition, you'll be latching onto it like a fly onto ****. Hi Gene, Suffering from www.Alzheimer's? You dropped the cue in the space of one line. :-) You really need to read Tom's comment. Your return to barnyard epithets again reinforces the fulfilled cliché of the bumpkin. Our comparison of credentials does serve a useful purpose, n'est pas? My sleeve runneth over. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:29:54 GMT, Richard Clark
wrote: On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:51:55 GMT, Gene Nygaard wrote: You haven't got it yet? I don't care. :-) Gee, I forgot. If anybody actually does come up with an official definition, you'll be latching onto it like a fly onto ****. Hi Gene, Suffering from www.Alzheimer's? You dropped the cue in the space of one line. :-) You really need to read Tom's comment. It's good to see that you have enough integrity left not to claim that the old NBS conversion factor which Tom found (which differs from the conditional definition given by Dr. Barry Taylor of NIST in 1995) is the *official* definition of a pound as a unit of force. Even if you were deceitfully hoping that some of the others in this thread would misinterpret that last-quoted statement that way. Gene Nygaard http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |