Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/9/2014 11:00 AM, John S wrote:
On 1/9/2014 10:53 AM, boomer wrote: We aren't talking multiple arrays in large places. Of course multiple speakers will provide more gain than one speaker. And horn speakers get their "gain" by directing more energy in one direction; there is a loss of signal in other directions. It has nothing to do with "impedance matching to the air" (there is no such thing). The laws of physics say it is impossible to create energy out of nothing, which is what you would be doing if you quadrupled the power (6db gain) by placing two speakers in phase. If you "measured" this, you need a new meter. I would love to tear apart your "reference". Non believer in facts. If you don't believe you should do tests, like me. I'll skip the horn for now.. If you can't believe two speakers will move TWICE the air doubling intensity, I don't know what else to say, except test yourself. Greg I have (I was an EE major). You can't create energy from nothing. The laws of physics don't allow it. And I currently have a business which deals with home entertainment systems. At MOST, two speakers in phase can move twice the air. No more, and in reality, because of inefficiencies, it will be less. I hate to question the law of conservation of energy at all, but I must say that there could be more energy delivered from two 8 ohm speakers in parallel than a single speaker powered by the same amplifier. Many amplifiers have 4 ohm outputs. So, you see the possibility. You would be delivering the same energy to both speakers as was delivered to one. Of course for those who believe in magical energy production, no reasoning will help. I personally have a Crown 810 powering a couple of AR SRT380s. The amplifier has 4 ohm outputs and the speakers are 4 ohms. There is nothing to be done to increase sound power except buy more efficient folded horn types. I have neither the space nor money to do so. However, at 420 watts rms per channel as it is now, I really don't require more power. Jimmy Hendrix sounds just fine to me. :-) I would hate to have you as my neighbor. I would have to call the police on you. We live in the North country close to the border. Our home, as are all, is heavily insulated. I run the music loud as I want without bothering the neighbours. The high wattage rating per channel is mostly just for the incredibly low terminal impedance. This makes for very good fidelity on high power low frequency. It is called inertial dampening. You have to run large diameter wire to keep this all working. I have the speakers hooked up with #10 wire. I checked performance of the speakers for this type wire by running one speaker with #16 lamp cord which I had been using and the other one hooked up with #10. I then switched to mono on the preamp. Using the balance control clearly showed a very noticeable improvement. I was told to use large dia wire to keep the resistance very low. I first thought this was really over-kill but by experiment I found that my advisor was correct. The impedance from the amp and wiring should be in the very low milliohms to prevent inertial overshoot. Purple Haze definitely sounded better :-) PS some have actually used #00 wire to their speakers. Without experimenting myself I feel by guessing that this is over-kill. I could be wrong, I was before. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stacking Satellite VHF and UHF F9FT Antennas | Antenna | |||
Stacking Big Wheel Antennas ? | Antenna | |||
Stacking Big Wheel Antennas??? | Homebrew | |||
Stacking Antennas | Antenna | |||
Stacking antennas | Antenna |