| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message ... snip In addition to the splitter losses, you have coax and connector loss. Coax loss probably isn't too bad, but unless you use a high quality crimping tool, connector loss can easily approach 0.25 to 0.5 db. Even with a high quality crimping tool, you can get around 0.1 db per connector. There is also the possibility of a slight phase difference of the signals coming out of the combiner, which would also affect the output (splitters/combiners aren't perfect, either). But I wouldn't think this would show up at such low frequencies unless you have lab-grade test equipment (microwave frequencies and above are a different story). All correct. As I said to Ian, I wanted to show I could create two matching signals then add them and the passive splitter/combiner output would be greater than either input, alone. Accuracy within a dB or so was sufficient to make the point. I wouldn't go to a professional meeting with the demonstration rig I used last night. Another experiment I ran (back around 1975) was to take 100 feet of cable and measure the loss, then repeat the measurement using a different 100 feet made from ten different pieces. Yup, the loss was about 3 dB more, indicative of an average 0.3 dB loss per joint, neatly within the range you specified. "Sal" |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Stacking Satellite VHF and UHF F9FT Antennas | Antenna | |||
| Stacking Big Wheel Antennas ? | Antenna | |||
| Stacking Big Wheel Antennas??? | Homebrew | |||
| Stacking Antennas | Antenna | |||
| Stacking antennas | Antenna | |||