Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/10/2014 7:01 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Jeff Liebermann writes On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:08:11 -0800, "Sal" salmonella@food poisoning.org wrote: Another experiment I ran (back around 1975) was to take 100 feet of cable and measure the loss, then repeat the measurement using a different 100 feet made from ten different pieces. Yup, the loss was about 3 dB more, indicative of an average 0.3 dB loss per joint, neatly within the range you specified. 0.3dB per connector at what frequency? This is more fun: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/connector-loss/index.html Just take every connector that you can find, put them in series, and measure the loss. In this case, it was done at 2.4Ghz and 450MHz. End to end loss at 2.4GHz was 2dB for about 25 adapters or about 0.08dB per adapter. At 250MHz, the loss was about 0.2dB or 0.008dB per adapter. I've done similar demonstrations using two wattmeters at the local radio club meeting. The results are typically that the adapter string has the same loss as an equivalent length of small coax cable. I had a surplus of BNC T connectors, so a strung about 50 of them in series and obtained similar results. Bottom line: Connectors and adapters aren't as evil as the data sheets and literature suggest. I've always assumed that the loss measured through connectors and adapters was mainly (a) because they have unavoidable length (ie not a lot), and (b) because the impedance match through them is less than perfect (ie not a lot). The ohmic contact resistance may also be a tiny tad higher than the same length of coax (even less). The main loss in a connector is due to the impedance bump at the connector. This can be easily seen on a TDR (Time Domain Reflectometry) display. Some connectors are better than others; for instance, the older F connectors which are crimped down with a ring are the worst. Next is the connector where the crimp is a hex crimp - it doesn't give a consistent impedance around the connector. The best (and the ones we use) compress the entire base of the connector evenly, creating a smooth crimp. The end of the coax is evenly covered by the connector. The other problem is the technician installing the connectors. I've seen great ones, and not-so-great ones. There are a lot of chances for going wrong - for instance, it's easy to screw up the braid when trying to insert a crimp-on connector under the outer jacket and shield. And soldering connectors (i.e. PL-259 and N) is almost sure to give you a huge bump (and loss) because it's almost impossible to solder the shield without melting the inner insulator to some point. It may not short out, but that doesn't mean you don't have loss there. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stacking Satellite VHF and UHF F9FT Antennas | Antenna | |||
Stacking Big Wheel Antennas ? | Antenna | |||
Stacking Big Wheel Antennas??? | Homebrew | |||
Stacking Antennas | Antenna | |||
Stacking antennas | Antenna |