Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, February 10, 2013 9:14:32 AM UTC-6, Ralph Mowery wrote:
When the lower radials were added the Ringo was suspose to work much beter. By that time, the Ringo had fallen out of favor around here so I do not know how well they worked. Main thing is that adding the radials defeated the purpose of the antenna, which was to eliminate the radials. Well maybe as far as the standard Ringo, which is a half wave. But the Ringo Ranger was a dual 5/8 collinear. Seems to me that design was used more to get more gain vs the shorter antennas, rather than trying to avoid radials. When it first came out, decoupling from the feed line was not given too much consideration, at least for lower cost amateur antennas.. And most that used it, thought it did OK. Likely because they had nothing better to compare to, or the feed line lengths, mounting, did not skew that pattern as bad in some cases, as it did others. The amount of skewing will vary some in each installation. It was pretty bad in my case. ![]() But then the Isopole came out.. And the roof caved in. lol.. The Isopole was so much better performing than the regular Ringo Ranger, that Cushcraft had no choice but to add some method of decoupling to their antenna, if they wanted to continue to sell many of them. So they added the lower 50 inches of coax, and a set of 1/4 wave radials at the bottom of that length of coax, which was grounded at that point, to the mast supporting the antenna. The decoupling section helped greatly, and saved Cushcraft from certain VHF vertical sales ruination. It was still slightly inferior to the method the Isopole used, but close enough to keep them in the game. Many preferred the RR2 because it was a bit less ugly than the Isopole. And maybe a bit cheaper, but I can't remember how they were priced at the time. The only band I ever used a 1/2 wave Ringo, was on 10m. And I ended up adding a Cushcraft type decoupling section to it. It worked very well. But the 5/8 antennas I used were better still.. But I didn't use 1/4 wave radials like most do with 5/8 ground planes. At that time, I used 3/4 wave radials, and the antenna doubled as an appx 1/4 GP on 30m. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS Dual Band VHF UHF Base Antenna | Swap | |||
Problem with dual band antenna | Antenna | |||
What's in a dual band 2m/70cm antenna? | Antenna | |||
Flower Pot Antenna a Dual-Band (20m and 10m) 'portable' Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Need dual band mobile antenna | Antenna |