![]() |
Battery charging question??
On 5/10/2013 8:26 AM, Tom wrote:
Hi again Sorry, I know I asked this question a couple years ago or a similiar one. I am stumbled again and I don't want to ruin my batteries so I thought I would ask the pros again. I have two Marine deep cycle 750 A Nautaulis Canadian Tire Batteries. 225min/115 ah model number is 10-3199-0. These are the bit bigger batteries about 40 lbs. I also have the 10am/2am Automatic Canadian Tire 11-1567-0 battery charger. I have had these batteries in my garage all winter and about once every month or 50 days I would bring them up to full charge. Takes about 25 or 30 hours at 10 amp charging until that GREEN light comes on and automatically shutting off. My problem is now that the green light isn't coming on. They are just sitting there bubbling away, I actually had to put about a litre or two into each of Reverse Osmosis water in to them because I could see they were low. But the green light will not come on and they keep charging. About 3 days now. I took both batteries down to Canadian Tire and the chap used a little hand tool electronic device that pumped me out a receipt thing (EXP800) and this battery test told me that the batteries are GOOD. Voltage is 12.63 for one and the other was 12.68 for the other. They measured 922 CCA and 684 CCA (both rated for 750A) so he said they are good. Temp was 19C I asked him why the green light doesn't come on and the charging stop but he said because the batteries are fully charged and good that the charger must be good. And it is good because I used it on another deep cycle battery I have and the green light came on and it stopped when fullly charged. I see the needle is close to the green on the meter but just not moving over and continues charging at 10 amps with the bigger batteries in question. Batteries are almost 4 years old. Any ideas or comments? Should I stop the charging? or continue until that green light comes on like it used to? I would like to get a few more years from these batteries . All coments are appreciated, cheap or otherwise, I appreciate your expertise very much. Sorry the question is OFF Topic, but I know you folks have the answer better than the boating groups. thnx Best regards and thanks 73s Hi Tom. What you want is a 3 stage charger. The guy who said the old "clunk", relay based, chargers are best is way off base. A decent 3 stage charger lets you set a number of things, all of which are tailored to your specific battery string. I have a set with an 80 AH and an 160 AH AGM 12V battery. I charge using a 200W solar array through a maximum power point 3 stage charger. The MPP part isn't relevant for you, but the 3 stage adjustments plus a battery temperature sensor are. You can set battery finish voltage per manufacturer specs at a specific temperature and then the sensor drives the rest based on current temperature. The 3 stages finish the charge the correct way and don't overcharge the string or cause excessive water loss. tom K0TAR |
Battery charging question??
On 5/11/2013 8:14 PM, tom wrote:
Hi Tom. What you want is a 3 stage charger. The guy who said the old "clunk", relay based, chargers are best is way off base. A decent 3 stage charger lets you set a number of things, all of which are tailored to your specific battery string. I have a set with an 80 AH and an 160 AH AGM 12V battery. I charge using a 200W solar array through a maximum power point 3 stage charger. The MPP part isn't relevant for you, but the 3 stage adjustments plus a battery temperature sensor are. You can set battery finish voltage per manufacturer specs at a specific temperature and then the sensor drives the rest based on current temperature. The 3 stages finish the charge the correct way and don't overcharge the string or cause excessive water loss. tom K0TAR Oops, forgot what I had. Put the string together last year from a 9 year old 66AH and a 4 year old 133AH battery. Each removed from a UPS system. I've had the 66AH for 6 years on intelligent solar controllers. Got the 133 last summer for $100 used. Upgraded my solar array to 200w from 33w and upgraded the controller to a 25 amp Solar Boost 2000e. They sat from November to end of April with no charging. I checked the voltage last week before I pulled the camper out of the garage for its first light of the year - 12.80 volts. That is in the excellent range after 5 months idle. Best buys on AGM batteries is to look for 3 to 5 year old ones being rotated out from data centers that demand high reliablity. They are usually rated for at least a 20 year life. And are 0 maintenance to boot. tom K0TAR |
Battery charging question??
On 5/11/2013 8:34 PM, tom wrote:
Best buys on AGM batteries is to look for 3 to 5 year old ones being rotated out from data centers that demand high reliablity. They are usually rated for at least a 20 year life. And are 0 maintenance to boot. tom K0TAR And finding the used ones isn't hard. I found the 133AH on craigs list. Be sure to buy identical types. My 2 are not the same AH rating but are from the same line by the same manufacturer. tom K0TAR |
Battery charging question??
On Sat, 11 May 2013 11:07:42 -0600, "Irv Finkleman"
wrote: My God! A Ham waiting till his bench is clean! Hah! Irv VE6BP Yes, I know. A clean workbench is a sign of a sick mind. http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/home/slides/chain-saw-repair.html It's currently not quite as messy, but it's close. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Battery charging question??
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... Yes, I know. A clean workbench is a sign of a sick mind. http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/home/slides/chain-saw-repair.html It's currently not quite as messy, but it's close. Looks like you have an antenna harness for phasing 2 meter antennas. Is the chain saw apart to put the co-phased antennas on ? hihi.. |
Battery charging question??
On Sun, 12 May 2013 16:34:53 -0400, "Ralph Mowery"
wrote: "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message .. . Yes, I know. A clean workbench is a sign of a sick mind. http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/home/slides/chain-saw-repair.html It's currently not quite as messy, but it's close. Looks like you have an antenna harness for phasing 2 meter antennas. I guess you mean the Wilkinson power divider/splitter in the lower left. It's not for phasing antennas, but for combining the signals from two receive only 1090MHz antennas for ADS-B reception. The lines are 3/4 electrical wavelengths long RG-6a/u because I couldn't find any small diameter 75 ohm coax. That was a prototype I just threw together to see if I really needed the 100 ohm resistor for receive only. With low gain antennas, it's not needed. For high gain, where impedance matching is more important, it's needed. Is the chain saw apart to put the co-phased antennas on ? hihi.. The chain saw has nothing to do with RF, unless you include using the trees as supports for various HF antennas. In this case, the only thing wrong with the saw was that the fuel line split and started leaking. In order to replace a simple fuel line, I had to tear down the saw completely. I used the occasion to also clean out the accumulated crud, clean the carb, replace various filters, clean the carbon out of the exhaust port, and do the usual tuneup. Right now, the bench has two weed whackers torn apart. Since I took them apart about 2 weeks ago, I don't remember which parts belong to which engine. This should be interesting... -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Battery charging question??
On Fri, 10 May 2013 23:36:44 -0400, rickman wrote:
Just like much of the equipment on the railroad, they had batteries in service for many, many years. I believe I was told they would be expected to last some 20 years. They looked like car batteries, not anything special like the huge ones they use at the phone company. The point is that they used a trickle charge. Presumably, those were flooded wet cell batteries, not AGM. I don't think that will work. Flooded cells lose about 1% of their charge per day due to self discharge. A trickle charger just can't keep up. However, AGM only loses 1% to 3% per month, which should work well with a trickle charger. But then there may be differences in batteries. Yep. Flooded versus AGM. These were some 40 years ago and I believe this was before they started adding small amounts of cadmium or similar things to reduce the need for adding water, etc. Maybe trickle charging is no longer recommended. But back then that was what the battery makers wanted you to do to prevent damage, trickle charge. One thing nice about trickle charging (and float charging) is that it seems to reduce suflation. Have you thought of contacting the company directly rather than through the stores? I bet their web site has some good info on this. My conspiracy theory of battery charging is that if you ask the battery vendor how to maintain and charge their batteries, they will direct you to the best way to kill the battery, so that you will buy more batteries. I suspect you may do better asking the battery charger vendors, who have a financial interest in keeping the batteries alive. Mo http://batteryuniversity.com http://www.mpoweruk.com http://www.mpoweruk.com/chargers.htm -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Battery charging question??
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... On Sun, 12 May 2013 16:34:53 -0400, "Ralph Mowery" wrote: "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message . .. Yes, I know. A clean workbench is a sign of a sick mind. http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/home/slides/chain-saw-repair.html It's currently not quite as messy, but it's close. Looks like you have an antenna harness for phasing 2 meter antennas. I guess you mean the Wilkinson power divider/splitter in the lower left. It's not for phasing antennas, but for combining the signals from two receive only 1090MHz antennas for ADS-B reception. The lines are 3/4 electrical wavelengths long RG-6a/u because I couldn't find any small diameter 75 ohm coax. That was a prototype I just threw together to see if I really needed the 100 ohm resistor for receive only. With low gain antennas, it's not needed. For high gain, where impedance matching is more important, it's needed. I know about the Wilkinsson devider. Not sure if it is done now, but the CBers would put two antennas on their cars and especially the big trucks. Feed them with a T and 1/4 wavelengths of coax if I recall corectly. Thought you were going to do that to the chain saw for 2 meters to help out your handy talkey while sawing wood. As if you could hear it over the noise. I have not looked over the power devider in a long time. I was thinking the 100 ohm resistor was mainly to absorbe the unballanced power. If everything was matched you could leave it out, but as you well know, nothing is perfect in the RF world. What are you using for a receiver for the ADS-B ? I have one of the dongles that plugs into the usb of a computer on order. Should be here Monday. It tunes from about 25 MHz to over 1 Ghz from the writeups. Off ebay here is the item number. 310655269457 I don' t see how they can make and ship a device like that for only $ 11.00. |
Battery charging question??
On Sun, 12 May 2013 17:56:21 -0400, "Ralph Mowery"
wrote: "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message .. . On Sun, 12 May 2013 16:34:53 -0400, "Ralph Mowery" wrote: "Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... Yes, I know. A clean workbench is a sign of a sick mind. http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/home/slides/chain-saw-repair.html It's currently not quite as messy, but it's close. Looks like you have an antenna harness for phasing 2 meter antennas. I guess you mean the Wilkinson power divider/splitter in the lower left. It's not for phasing antennas, but for combining the signals from two receive only 1090MHz antennas for ADS-B reception. The lines are 3/4 electrical wavelengths long RG-6a/u because I couldn't find any small diameter 75 ohm coax. That was a prototype I just threw together to see if I really needed the 100 ohm resistor for receive only. With low gain antennas, it's not needed. For high gain, where impedance matching is more important, it's needed. I know about the Wilkinsson devider. Not sure if it is done now, but the CBers would put two antennas on their cars and especially the big trucks. Feed them with a T and 1/4 wavelengths of coax if I recall corectly. Yep. It was called a "co-phasing harness". Basically, the same thing as a Wilkinson power divider. The original purpose was to deal with the problem that the truckers were having with mounting antennas on their big rigs. The antenna could not be mounted on top of the tractor or trailer because the weight scale operators did not like antennas smashing into the overhead clearance gauges. However, one antenna on the side of the tractor didn't work very well because it blocked signals on the other side. Two antennas were just fine. The only problem was that while in receive, there was little loss from either antenna, in transmit, the power was split equally between sides. To compensate, doubling the transmit power was deemed necessary. It worked. At the time 1973(?), I was working on an ill fated CB related project that would eventually have Antenna Specialists' name on it. I discussed the co-phasing harness problem with one of their engineers. He mumbled something about it being a great way to double antenna sales. The rest you can guess. Thought you were going to do that to the chain saw for 2 meters to help out your handy talkey while sawing wood. As if you could hear it over the noise. Yacking on the radio while operating a rather dangerous piece of machinery is not a great idea. If someone wants to yell at me, they can wait until I'm done sawing. I have not looked over the power devider in a long time. I was thinking the 100 ohm resistor was mainly to absorbe the unballanced power. If everything was matched you could leave it out, but as you well know, nothing is perfect in the RF world. True for a splitter. Not quite so true for a combiner. It's main purpose it to provide the best possible isolation between input ports. The phase shift through the *TWO* 1/4 wave lines, combined through the 100 ohm resistor, exactly cancel, which provides the necessary isolation. If you look at the specs for a combiner, you'll see the isolation specification. What are you using for a receiver for the ADS-B ? One of the receive stations for one of the aircraft monitoring networks. http://planefinder.net http://my.pinkfroot.com http://Flightradar24.com I have one of the dongles that plugs into the usb of a computer on order. Should be here Monday. It tunes from about 25 MHz to over 1 Ghz from the writeups. Off ebay here is the item number. 310655269457 I don' t see how they can make and ship a device like that for only $ 11.00. Yep, very cheap. I couldn't afford to ship an empty box for that price. http://www.ebay.com/itm/310655269457 There are numerous projects on the web for turning it into everything from a spectrum analyzer to a radio scanner. http://www.hamradioscience.com/building-an-inexpensive-ads-b-receiving-and-sharing-station/ http://panteltje.com/panteltje/xpsa/index.html I could use one of those RTL8232U dongles, but I have a different problem to solve. 1090MHz is in the middle of the frequencies used by DME (distance measuring equip) which provides a challenge in interference reduction using DSP. The receivers will probably be located in the middle of transmitter infested mountain tops, which means they need a really good IM tolerant front end. The antenna problem is also unique in that it requires maximum gain toward the horizon in order to maximize range, but also must still have some gain overhead to hear closer aircraft. I combine two antennas for the purpose. http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/antennas/AMOS-3-INV-1090Mhz/index.html -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Battery charging question??
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message ... Yep. It was called a "co-phasing harness". Basically, the same thing as a Wilkinson power divider. The original purpose was to deal with the problem that the truckers were having with mounting antennas on their big rigs. The antenna could not be mounted on top of the tractor or trailer because the weight scale operators did not like antennas smashing into the overhead clearance gauges. However, one antenna on the side of the tractor didn't work very well because it blocked signals on the other side. Two antennas were just fine. The only problem was that while in receive, there was little loss from either antenna, in transmit, the power was split equally between sides. To compensate, doubling the transmit power was deemed necessary. It worked. At the time 1973(?), I was working on an ill fated CB related project that would eventually have Antenna Specialists' name on it. I discussed the co-phasing harness problem with one of their engineers. He mumbled something about it being a great way to double antenna sales. The rest you can guess. During that period of time I repaired things for the CBers to pick up some extra spending money. I was thinking there was a mobile antenna system that you mounted two antennas and had a switch box that phased them for differant directions. Don't believe it worked too well as the antennas were usually too close together. The the base station 'scanner' antenna was devoloped using 3 verticals in a triangle patern several feet apart. Seemed to work ok for what it was. During that period of time, I think Antenna Specialists' made up much of the CB antenna sales. Only double the power,, many of the ones I knew ran 50 to 100 watts in the mobiles back in the 70's . During those years you could sell almost anything to the CB. Much like for the last number of years you can sell to the audio/hifi people. Best scam I know of is the wire going from the hifi to the wall socket. For about $ 120 you get 6 to 8 feet of 'special wire' Even if it was special that would not account for the wire going from the outlet to the breaker box and then to th epole transformer.. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com