Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Art wrote,
Tom, I wouldn't be so quick in using the term " impossible" if I were you until the facts come out. He has already stated that he has a distributed load antenna which he referres to as a two dimensional helix, which I see as a meander line on a circuit board. This ofcourse, provides an antenna of very small size which has some drawbacks. But the inventor states that the design is a combination of known ideas which may well be a method of overcomming initial drawbacks. After all a University have placed themselves behind the inventor and most of us did not go to University on a platform of disbelieving our professors . Even if it all turns out to be a mistaken idea the majority of hams will learn from future interchange rather than tagging along with those who believe all is already known.Usually the best inventions are an amaqlgamation of all the good observations noted in otherwise bad ideas/inventions made by somebody who looks for every morsel that is new and is resourceful enough to connect the dots before it becomes obvious to the followers.It is rare that someting that comes along is totally new in its entirety. Regards Art Hi Art, he may very well have produced an antenna that works as advertised. Time will tell. However, in evaluating the claims of anyone who invents something new it is always advisable to compare those claims with current theory before accepting them wholeheartedly. It isn't impossible to make a small, useful, antenna - the small-in-terms-of-wavelength loop is a case in point - but to make a small antenna with all the characteristics of a large antenna strains the credibility. It sounds as if this gentleman is trying to take advantage of the properties of the double-tuned circuit in order to achieve a larger bandwidth while maintaining good efficiency. If so, it's an interesting idea and I hope it works, but I'm not going to get excited about it until I know more, such as, what happens to the radiation pattern when the current in the top part of the antenna is out of phase with the current in the bottom part? Does it then radiate straight up, or does he have some method of controlling the phase so it doesn't do this? 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |