Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike wrote, What I have become stuck on is the claim of constant current along the length of the antenna - or 80 percent as claimed. How does this work? I don't profess to know much about these matters, but if the current stays the same, then the voltage must too? And i still can't figure out how such an efficient antenna "melts". 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - Anyone can make a "constant current" dipole, just by making it small enough in relation to the wavelength of the frequency it's to be used for. Of course, as has been pointed out here many times, feeding such an antenna would be difficult to impossible, and bandwidth would be small, but you can't have everything. Some theorists in the late 1940's did some work on the fundamental limits of small antennas. There are one or two papers available on the web if you search for "small antennas" with google. People who think they can make a small (in terms of a wavelength) single radiator antenna, with good efficiency, and a large bandwidth, that doesn't have to resort to feedline radiation to achieve its aims, would do well to read these papers before making themselves look silly by claiming the impossible. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |