| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Where's Chip when you need him!
This newsgroup is very slow.
I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek |
Where's Chip when you need him!
amdx wrote:
This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Don't forget Szczepan Bialek with his "a dipole is a monopole" discussions and his obsession for theories over 100 years old... |
Where's Chip when you need him!
"amdx" wrote in message ... This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek LOL. Yep, he did generate some traffic. About his "fractvert" I remember thousands of posts telling why he couldn't simply list the three EZNEC segments that fully describe it. On the other hand, we should be careful what we ask for :) Wayne W5GIE Redlands, CA |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Monday, August 5, 2013 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote:
This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek You can find Chip (W1YW) on QRZ.com |
Where's Chip when you need him!
In article ,
wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. ....(snip)... You can find Chip (W1YW) on QRZ.com Are you arguing for not visiting QRZ.com ;-) ? David, VE7EZM and AF7BZ -- David Ryeburn To send e-mail, change "netz" to "net" |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 8:04:59 PM UTC-5, David Ryeburn wrote:
In article , wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. ...(snip)... You can find Chip (W1YW) on QRZ.com Are you arguing for not visiting QRZ.com ;-) ? He's likely to sue anyone that shows up.. :/ |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote:
This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle. Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king! |
Where's Chip when you need him!
|
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017, wrote:
wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle. Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king! You are responding to something that is nearly 4 years old. There's been worse. I was going to say at least I recognize the poster being replied to from 2013, he's still active, and since he just replied, he must be reading this newsgroup too still. Most of the time when someone replies to an old post, the original poster was never here for much more than that single post. Michael |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 12:31:10 AM UTC-5, wrote:
wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle. Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king! You are responding to something that is nearly 4 years old. -- Jim Pennino Indeed. Success has its compromises--like not having the time to respond to defamatory statements inveighed thru this 'news'group. You guys need to grow up and accept the fact that fractal antennas work as stated (by me) and are here to stay. This despite the bitterness of (some) bashing hams-- who (curiously!)died early; some of you call that the 'fractal curse'---- and others with nothing but time on their hands. I have a very good memory gentlemen; not all of you were so profoundly unkind, and I thank those few for their reasonable queries and responses. The rest of you got your own instant karma. IMO. I am doing very FB. And enjoying myself immensely, but with a jam packed schedule. With no time for those who sit around trying to bash the already proven. Yawn. Flower children grown thorns. Jealous? Tuff:-)! |
Where's Chip when you need him!
wrote:
On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 12:31:10 AM UTC-5, wrote: wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle. Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king! You are responding to something that is nearly 4 years old. -- Jim Pennino Indeed. Success has its compromises--like not having the time to respond to defamatory statements inveighed thru this 'news'group. You guys need to grow up and accept the fact that fractal antennas work as stated (by me) and are here to stay. This despite the bitterness of (some) bashing hams-- who (curiously!)died early; some of you call that the 'fractal curse'---- and others with nothing but time on their hands. I have a very good memory gentlemen; not all of you were so profoundly unkind, and I thank those few for their reasonable queries and responses. The rest of you got your own instant karma. IMO. I am doing very FB. And enjoying myself immensely, but with a jam packed schedule. With no time for those who sit around trying to bash the already proven. Yawn. Flower children grown thorns. Jealous? Tuff:-)! You are responding to something that is nearly 2 months old. -- Jim Pennino |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 1:46:05 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote: On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 12:31:10 AM UTC-5, wrote: wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle. Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king! You are responding to something that is nearly 4 years old. -- Jim Pennino Indeed. Success has its compromises--like not having the time to respond to defamatory statements inveighed thru this 'news'group. You guys need to grow up and accept the fact that fractal antennas work as stated (by me) and are here to stay. This despite the bitterness of (some) bashing hams-- who (curiously!)died early; some of you call that the 'fractal curse'---- and others with nothing but time on their hands. I have a very good memory gentlemen; not all of you were so profoundly unkind, and I thank those few for their reasonable queries and responses. The rest of you got your own instant karma. IMO. I am doing very FB. And enjoying myself immensely, but with a jam packed schedule. With no time for those who sit around trying to bash the already proven. Yawn. Flower children grown thorns. Jealous? Tuff:-)! You are responding to something that is nearly 2 months old. -- Jim Pennino No Jim; I am responding to a bunch of-- old men-- who thought it was cool to bash others. Now go play with your grandkids or dog. I am not fresh meat for bashing. |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On 4/23/2017 3:00 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 1:46:05 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 12:31:10 AM UTC-5, wrote: wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle. Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king! You are responding to something that is nearly 4 years old. -- Jim Pennino Indeed. Success has its compromises--like not having the time to respond to defamatory statements inveighed thru this 'news'group. You guys need to grow up and accept the fact that fractal antennas work as stated (by me) and are here to stay. This despite the bitterness of (some) bashing hams-- who (curiously!)died early; some of you call that the 'fractal curse'---- and others with nothing but time on their hands. I have a very good memory gentlemen; not all of you were so profoundly unkind, and I thank those few for their reasonable queries and responses. The rest of you got your own instant karma. IMO. I am doing very FB. And enjoying myself immensely, but with a jam packed schedule. With no time for those who sit around trying to bash the already proven. Yawn. Flower children grown thorns. Jealous? Tuff:-)! You are responding to something that is nearly 2 months old. -- Jim Pennino No Jim; I am responding to a bunch of-- old men-- who thought it was cool to bash others. Now go play with your grandkids or dog. I am not fresh meat for bashing. I'm not very good at remembering people in newsgroups, there is just a printed name and some talk which is not enough to form much of an image in my mind. I think I recall jim as being a real piece of work, but I'm not certain I have the right guy. I want to say the person I recall actually tried tracking down my history and claimed I wasn't a degreed engineer. lol People like that aren't even worth the response. I find it interesting that so far he has only commented on the fact that you don't return to the group very often. Nothing of value to say at all. I don't think I've seen any of your fractal antenna work. I would be interested. Is there a link? -- Rick C |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 3:25:07 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/23/2017 3:00 PM, wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 1:46:05 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 12:31:10 AM UTC-5, wrote: wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle. Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king! You are responding to something that is nearly 4 years old. -- Jim Pennino Indeed. Success has its compromises--like not having the time to respond to defamatory statements inveighed thru this 'news'group. You guys need to grow up and accept the fact that fractal antennas work as stated (by me) and are here to stay. This despite the bitterness of (some) bashing hams-- who (curiously!)died early; some of you call that the 'fractal curse'---- and others with nothing but time on their hands. I have a very good memory gentlemen; not all of you were so profoundly unkind, and I thank those few for their reasonable queries and responses. The rest of you got your own instant karma. IMO. I am doing very FB. And enjoying myself immensely, but with a jam packed schedule. With no time for those who sit around trying to bash the already proven. Yawn. Flower children grown thorns. Jealous? Tuff:-)! You are responding to something that is nearly 2 months old. -- Jim Pennino No Jim; I am responding to a bunch of-- old men-- who thought it was cool to bash others. Now go play with your grandkids or dog. I am not fresh meat for bashing. I'm not very good at remembering people in newsgroups, there is just a printed name and some talk which is not enough to form much of an image in my mind. I think I recall jim as being a real piece of work, but I'm not certain I have the right guy. I want to say the person I recall actually tried tracking down my history and claimed I wasn't a degreed engineer. lol People like that aren't even worth the response. I find it interesting that so far he has only commented on the fact that you don't return to the group very often. Nothing of value to say at all. I don't think I've seen any of your fractal antenna work. I would be interested. Is there a link? -- Rick C Well Rick, Loss of memory is a common attribute of aging. I can't help you on that. I can say that Jim's complaint of time--BTW call for Jim Pennino is WB6DKH--is also a common issue with aging. What brought me back, Rick, was the ---admission of cruelty-- by one of your pals here on the 'news' group. And many of you looked back with nostalgic tears of 'beating'. I just thought y'all like to know that I am so glad that I have been able to age so well, and watch those who dispense with cruelty age so poorly. Not sure where you fall there Rick, so let's leave it at that. I wouldn't want the display of facts to be confused with cruelty. As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Time has been very good to me, for those who help themselves, and then help others. So, to use the word of the hour, 'beat' that, OM. Regards. Busy writing a patent and you guys have nothing to say, it would seem. |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 at 9:04:59 PM UTC-4, David Ryeburn wrote:
In article , wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. ...(snip)... You can find Chip (W1YW) on QRZ.com Are you arguing for not visiting QRZ.com ;-) ? David, VE7EZM and AF7BZ -- David Ryeburn To send e-mail, change "netz" to "net" No Gave, He's arguing for not being a * hole, such as you are being right now. |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Friday, September 27, 2013 at 1:13:03 AM UTC-4, wrote:
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 8:04:59 PM UTC-5, David Ryeburn wrote: In article , wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. ...(snip)... You can find Chip (W1YW) on QRZ.com Are you arguing for not visiting QRZ.com ;-) ? He's likely to sue anyone that shows up.. :/ Why don't you get on line and show us all the lawsuits . Believe me, I can and could easily afford the process. But resolution, to my satisfaction, has not, to date, required that burden on defendants. You guys would recognize the callsigns of two of my lawyers. You can find me lots of places, but usually working in the lab with customers, or hanging with my family or friends. Not here, obviously. I have someplace to go and things to do, and people to see. How 'bout you? |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On 4/23/2017 4:49 PM, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 3:25:07 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote: On 4/23/2017 3:00 PM, wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 1:46:05 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 12:31:10 AM UTC-5, wrote: wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle. Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king! You are responding to something that is nearly 4 years old. -- Jim Pennino Indeed. Success has its compromises--like not having the time to respond to defamatory statements inveighed thru this 'news'group. You guys need to grow up and accept the fact that fractal antennas work as stated (by me) and are here to stay. This despite the bitterness of (some) bashing hams-- who (curiously!)died early; some of you call that the 'fractal curse'---- and others with nothing but time on their hands. I have a very good memory gentlemen; not all of you were so profoundly unkind, and I thank those few for their reasonable queries and responses. The rest of you got your own instant karma. IMO. I am doing very FB. And enjoying myself immensely, but with a jam packed schedule. With no time for those who sit around trying to bash the already proven. Yawn. Flower children grown thorns. Jealous? Tuff:-)! You are responding to something that is nearly 2 months old. -- Jim Pennino No Jim; I am responding to a bunch of-- old men-- who thought it was cool to bash others. Now go play with your grandkids or dog. I am not fresh meat for bashing. I'm not very good at remembering people in newsgroups, there is just a printed name and some talk which is not enough to form much of an image in my mind. I think I recall jim as being a real piece of work, but I'm not certain I have the right guy. I want to say the person I recall actually tried tracking down my history and claimed I wasn't a degreed engineer. lol People like that aren't even worth the response. I find it interesting that so far he has only commented on the fact that you don't return to the group very often. Nothing of value to say at all. I don't think I've seen any of your fractal antenna work. I would be interested. Is there a link? -- Rick C Well Rick, Loss of memory is a common attribute of aging. I can't help you on that. I can say that Jim's complaint of time--BTW call for Jim Pennino is WB6DKH--is also a common issue with aging. What brought me back, Rick, was the ---admission of cruelty-- by one of your pals here on the 'news' group. And many of you looked back with nostalgic tears of 'beating'. I just thought y'all like to know that I am so glad that I have been able to age so well, and watch those who dispense with cruelty age so poorly. Not sure where you fall there Rick, so let's leave it at that. I wouldn't want the display of facts to be confused with cruelty. As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Time has been very good to me, for those who help themselves, and then help others. So, to use the word of the hour, 'beat' that, OM. Regards. Busy writing a patent and you guys have nothing to say, it would seem. I can't say I understand your reply. I'm interested in your work. Do you share any of it on a web site? -- Rick C |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 5:09:46 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/23/2017 4:49 PM, wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 3:25:07 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote: On 4/23/2017 3:00 PM, wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 1:46:05 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 12:31:10 AM UTC-5, wrote: wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Well Mike, I certainly don't hang around people whose idea of a good time is to pull the feathers off a live eagle. Sory to be 'so slow'; lotsa cool fractal antenna action. Its good to be da king! You are responding to something that is nearly 4 years old. -- Jim Pennino Indeed. Success has its compromises--like not having the time to respond to defamatory statements inveighed thru this 'news'group. You guys need to grow up and accept the fact that fractal antennas work as stated (by me) and are here to stay. This despite the bitterness of (some) bashing hams-- who (curiously!)died early; some of you call that the 'fractal curse'---- and others with nothing but time on their hands. I have a very good memory gentlemen; not all of you were so profoundly unkind, and I thank those few for their reasonable queries and responses. The rest of you got your own instant karma. IMO. I am doing very FB. And enjoying myself immensely, but with a jam packed schedule. With no time for those who sit around trying to bash the already proven. Yawn. Flower children grown thorns. Jealous? Tuff:-)! You are responding to something that is nearly 2 months old. -- Jim Pennino No Jim; I am responding to a bunch of-- old men-- who thought it was cool to bash others. Now go play with your grandkids or dog. I am not fresh meat for bashing. I'm not very good at remembering people in newsgroups, there is just a printed name and some talk which is not enough to form much of an image in my mind. I think I recall jim as being a real piece of work, but I'm not certain I have the right guy. I want to say the person I recall actually tried tracking down my history and claimed I wasn't a degreed engineer. lol People like that aren't even worth the response. I find it interesting that so far he has only commented on the fact that you don't return to the group very often. Nothing of value to say at all. I don't think I've seen any of your fractal antenna work. I would be interested. Is there a link? -- Rick C Well Rick, Loss of memory is a common attribute of aging. I can't help you on that.. I can say that Jim's complaint of time--BTW call for Jim Pennino is WB6DKH--is also a common issue with aging. What brought me back, Rick, was the ---admission of cruelty-- by one of your pals here on the 'news' group. And many of you looked back with nostalgic tears of 'beating'. I just thought y'all like to know that I am so glad that I have been able to age so well, and watch those who dispense with cruelty age so poorly. Not sure where you fall there Rick, so let's leave it at that. I wouldn't want the display of facts to be confused with cruelty. As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Time has been very good to me, for those who help themselves, and then help others. So, to use the word of the hour, 'beat' that, OM. Regards. Busy writing a patent and you guys have nothing to say, it would seem. I can't say I understand your reply. I'm interested in your work. Do you share any of it on a web site? -- Rick C No, I do not 'share'. If you want to wait, you can buy a book from Artech House that reviews fractal antennas. |
Where's Chip when you need him!
|
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote: As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very low volume groups like this one. Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen. -- Jim Pennino If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape. What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead. Just wanted you to know, I am not.I am 62 and called you other old guys out on your transgressions. And as my experiences are now of interest to various historians, I didnt want them to ask the question: hmmmm...'why didnt he defend himself against these cruel hams'? The archival record reveals these select hams either gave up or died early. I did neither. And am flourishing. I wish I could feel more empathy for you guys in your awkward and delusional sense of superiority, but it, frankly, is pathetic. So now everyone knows. Now, and forever:-) Nest time, lead with friendly, rather than lead with (falsely based) derision. Good luck! |
Where's Chip when you need him!
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very low volume groups like this one. Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen. -- Jim Pennino If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape. What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead. No, I meant exactly what I said. snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble -- Jim Pennino |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very low volume groups like this one. Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen. -- Jim Pennino If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape. What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead. No, I meant exactly what I said. snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble -- Jim Pennino I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO. But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic. How old are you, Jim? |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very low volume groups like this one. Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen. -- Jim Pennino If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape. What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead. No, I meant exactly what I said. snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble -- Jim Pennino I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO. But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic. How old are you, Jim? Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting. You are 72 plus or minus a year. So, all I can say is have a pleasant day. And leave the driving to us. |
Where's Chip when you need him!
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very low volume groups like this one. Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen. -- Jim Pennino If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape. What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead. No, I meant exactly what I said. snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble -- Jim Pennino I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO. Reality is that google groups posters tend to respond to long dead posts. Why you are trying to start an arguement over this simple fact is irrelevant to me. snip remaining self centered nonsense -- Jim Pennino |
Where's Chip when you need him!
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very low volume groups like this one. Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen. -- Jim Pennino If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape. What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead. No, I meant exactly what I said. snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble -- Jim Pennino I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO. But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic. How old are you, Jim? Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting. So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on others; hardly surprising. snip remaining babble -- Jim Pennino |
Where's Chip when you need him!
|
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 9:16:13 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very low volume groups like this one. Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen. -- Jim Pennino If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape. What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead. No, I meant exactly what I said. snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble -- Jim Pennino I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO. But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic. How old are you, Jim? Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting. So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on others; hardly surprising. snip remaining babble -- Jim Pennino Go drink your prune juice, dear. |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 9:16:13 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very low volume groups like this one. Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen. -- Jim Pennino If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape. What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead. No, I meant exactly what I said. snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble -- Jim Pennino I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO. But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic. How old are you, Jim? Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting. So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on others; hardly surprising. snip remaining babble -- Jim Pennino Of course the most interesting thing, Jim Pennino,WB6DKH, is that not only has the course of 30 years of fractal antennas revealed an innovation which caught on--big-- but a textbook case of CYBERBULLYING by so many of your cohorts, right here on this 'news' group. But clearly, and despite voluminous efforts by your cohorts, I refused and refuse to be a victim. Indeed, unbeknownst to you. and others Jim, kids in GRADE SCHOOL are taught nowadays to BUILD FRACTAL ANTENNAS as part of their innovation/math curriculum . Why, the NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION even FUNDED THOSE EFFORTS. So, while you sit in your LA Z Boy and contemplate derision as a substitute for objective skepticism, the world has turned, and changed, leaving your view of reality limited to as far as you can spit. And knowing that lots of non-hams, now and in the future , will find and absorb these precious words, it is important, to the little kids and the big dreamers, that they appreciate that CYBERBULLYING is unacceptable, and one should NEVER ALLOW others to make you a victim. Sorry, my friend, I am not a victim, and will not ne victimized, or demonized, and so on. So, my friend, nice try labelling me a 'stalker'. Nope. Just wanted all our future readers to have a bead on you and your cohorts. Have a pleasant day, and as they say in the world of metamucil,'this too shall pass'. 73 Chip W1YW |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote:
This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Here it is for everyone to see:"enthusiasm for BEATING". Aren't you ASHAMED of yourself?? And are we to infer that:'Where's Chip When You Need him" is a cry for further individuals to cyberbully? I am waiting for sober voices to apologize to me--here, publicly-- so that the kids and dreamers are corrected from thinking you are cruel and a cyberbully, a so are your cohorts. Be a man and apologize. |
Where's Chip when you need him!
|
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 12:10:42 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/24/2017 11:37 AM, wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Here it is for everyone to see:"enthusiasm for BEATING". Aren't you ASHAMED of yourself?? And are we to infer that:'Where's Chip When You Need him" is a cry for further individuals to cyberbully? I am waiting for sober voices to apologize to me--here, publicly-- so that the kids and dreamers are corrected from thinking you are cruel and a cyberbully, a so are your cohorts. Be a man and apologize. I'm not sure what is going on with you, but you seem to take every comment as an insult.. Maybe I am misreading what Mike is saying, but I don't get your reply in any case. You've been gone for a long time, you return and immediately get into arguments. Wouldn't it be better to just ignore the comments you find as ugly? I know that is what I try to do. People like Jim aren't worth arguing with. If you would like to discuss your fractal antennas, I'm all ears. -- Rick C No, This thread is about: "Where's Chip When you Need Him?". Obviously, I am 'needed' Answer: I am HERE. But I will not tolerate any abuse, and will call those who do so, on just that point. If you want to discuss fractal antennas, then start a new thread and have fun. I see no reason to spend time on that topic on any newsgroup, as the audience is so closed and there is no way to project images on the newsgroup page. Basically, I don;t care. I am not here to entertain you. May I suggest you just close the thread and I will no longer feel that I am being requested for a "beating". Apologies still in order. To me. |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 12:10:42 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/24/2017 11:37 AM, wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Here it is for everyone to see:"enthusiasm for BEATING". Aren't you ASHAMED of yourself?? And are we to infer that:'Where's Chip When You Need him" is a cry for further individuals to cyberbully? I am waiting for sober voices to apologize to me--here, publicly-- so that the kids and dreamers are corrected from thinking you are cruel and a cyberbully, a so are your cohorts. Be a man and apologize. I'm not sure what is going on with you, but you seem to take every comment as an insult.. Maybe I am misreading what Mike is saying, but I don't get your reply in any case. You've been gone for a long time, you return and immediately get into arguments. Wouldn't it be better to just ignore the comments you find as ugly? I know that is what I try to do. People like Jim aren't worth arguing with. If you would like to discuss your fractal antennas, I'm all ears. -- Rick C No. Ignoring such comments in the age of eternal archiving doesn't work. Its CYBERBULLYING. I am a very sane person with resources behind me. I am in a position to stop it. And that starts with calling some of you folks on that point. If you find that distasteful, then ask why you wanted me back in the first place. Advice your mother gave you when being called names doesn't work in such archival permanence. It akin to Germany ignoring Hitler in 1930.... heck, just ignore 'em. Right? |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On 4/24/2017 1:04 PM, wrote:
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 12:10:42 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote: On 4/24/2017 11:37 AM, wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Here it is for everyone to see:"enthusiasm for BEATING". Aren't you ASHAMED of yourself?? And are we to infer that:'Where's Chip When You Need him" is a cry for further individuals to cyberbully? I am waiting for sober voices to apologize to me--here, publicly-- so that the kids and dreamers are corrected from thinking you are cruel and a cyberbully, a so are your cohorts. Be a man and apologize. I'm not sure what is going on with you, but you seem to take every comment as an insult.. Maybe I am misreading what Mike is saying, but I don't get your reply in any case. You've been gone for a long time, you return and immediately get into arguments. Wouldn't it be better to just ignore the comments you find as ugly? I know that is what I try to do. People like Jim aren't worth arguing with. If you would like to discuss your fractal antennas, I'm all ears. -- Rick C No, This thread is about: "Where's Chip When you Need Him?". Obviously, I am 'needed' Answer: I am HERE. But I will not tolerate any abuse, and will call those who do so, on just that point. If you want to discuss fractal antennas, then start a new thread and have fun. I see no reason to spend time on that topic on any newsgroup, as the audience is so closed and there is no way to project images on the newsgroup page. Basically, I don;t care. I am not here to entertain you. May I suggest you just close the thread and I will no longer feel that I am being requested for a "beating". Apologies still in order. To me. I think you have misunderstood the original post. He was not suggesting anyone should "beat" you or taking pleasure in anyone else "beating" you. He was simply saying that since the drama has ended this group has has little useful discussion. But then that is what I have found in all of the amateur radio newsgroups. There are three ways they go. Either they are full of abusive jerks or they are moderated to the extent it is hard to get a post up or they are simply echo chambers with tons of auto-posted blog crap like this one. -- Rick C |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On 4/24/2017 1:12 PM, wrote:
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 12:10:42 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote: On 4/24/2017 11:37 AM, wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Here it is for everyone to see:"enthusiasm for BEATING". Aren't you ASHAMED of yourself?? And are we to infer that:'Where's Chip When You Need him" is a cry for further individuals to cyberbully? I am waiting for sober voices to apologize to me--here, publicly-- so that the kids and dreamers are corrected from thinking you are cruel and a cyberbully, a so are your cohorts. Be a man and apologize. I'm not sure what is going on with you, but you seem to take every comment as an insult.. Maybe I am misreading what Mike is saying, but I don't get your reply in any case. You've been gone for a long time, you return and immediately get into arguments. Wouldn't it be better to just ignore the comments you find as ugly? I know that is what I try to do. People like Jim aren't worth arguing with. If you would like to discuss your fractal antennas, I'm all ears. -- Rick C No. Ignoring such comments in the age of eternal archiving doesn't work. Its CYBERBULLYING. I am a very sane person with resources behind me. I am in a position to stop it. And that starts with calling some of you folks on that point. If you find that distasteful, then ask why you wanted me back in the first place. Advice your mother gave you when being called names doesn't work in such archival permanence. It akin to Germany ignoring Hitler in 1930.... heck, just ignore 'em. Right? I'm not going to keep arguing with you about this, but I think it is clear that your sanity can be questioned regarding your OCD-like behavior. Actually your mom's advice is perfectly appropriate in newsgroups. It's just a bunch of people saying what they feel like saying of no consequence. They are quite easy to ignore. I do it all the time. I dare you to ignore this post. :) -- Rick C |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 1:17:06 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/24/2017 1:04 PM, wrote: On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 12:10:42 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote: On 4/24/2017 11:37 AM, wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Here it is for everyone to see:"enthusiasm for BEATING". Aren't you ASHAMED of yourself?? And are we to infer that:'Where's Chip When You Need him" is a cry for further individuals to cyberbully? I am waiting for sober voices to apologize to me--here, publicly-- so that the kids and dreamers are corrected from thinking you are cruel and a cyberbully, a so are your cohorts. Be a man and apologize. I'm not sure what is going on with you, but you seem to take every comment as an insult.. Maybe I am misreading what Mike is saying, but I don't get your reply in any case. You've been gone for a long time, you return and immediately get into arguments. Wouldn't it be better to just ignore the comments you find as ugly? I know that is what I try to do. People like Jim aren't worth arguing with. If you would like to discuss your fractal antennas, I'm all ears. -- Rick C No, This thread is about: "Where's Chip When you Need Him?". Obviously, I am 'needed' Answer: I am HERE. But I will not tolerate any abuse, and will call those who do so, on just that point. If you want to discuss fractal antennas, then start a new thread and have fun. I see no reason to spend time on that topic on any newsgroup, as the audience is so closed and there is no way to project images on the newsgroup page. Basically, I don;t care. I am not here to entertain you. May I suggest you just close the thread and I will no longer feel that I am being requested for a "beating". Apologies still in order. To me. I think you have misunderstood the original post. He was not suggesting anyone should "beat" you or taking pleasure in anyone else "beating" you. He was simply saying that since the drama has ended this group has has little useful discussion. But then that is what I have found in all of the amateur radio newsgroups. There are three ways they go. Either they are full of abusive jerks or they are moderated to the extent it is hard to get a post up or they are simply echo chambers with tons of auto-posted blog crap like this one. -- Rick C No, I didn't misunderstand anything. You guys wanted someone to abuse, and then when someone volunteered a candidate, you started the abuse in absentia. Now that I am here. well, good luck! You guys wanted me back. If you all want to be cordial and reasonable, I will respond, if I choose to respond, in kind. Perhaps your mother taught you that one; I would bet so. |
Where's Chip when you need him!
On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 1:21:35 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/24/2017 1:12 PM, wrote: On Monday, April 24, 2017 at 12:10:42 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote: On 4/24/2017 11:37 AM, wrote: On Monday, August 5, 2013 at 12:52:47 PM UTC-4, amdx wrote: This newsgroup is very slow. I remember fondly when Chip was here taking a beating here for discussing his Fractal Antenna. At least there was some enthusiasm shown. Mikek Here it is for everyone to see:"enthusiasm for BEATING". Aren't you ASHAMED of yourself?? And are we to infer that:'Where's Chip When You Need him" is a cry for further individuals to cyberbully? I am waiting for sober voices to apologize to me--here, publicly-- so that the kids and dreamers are corrected from thinking you are cruel and a cyberbully, a so are your cohorts. Be a man and apologize. I'm not sure what is going on with you, but you seem to take every comment as an insult.. Maybe I am misreading what Mike is saying, but I don't get your reply in any case. You've been gone for a long time, you return and immediately get into arguments. Wouldn't it be better to just ignore the comments you find as ugly? I know that is what I try to do. People like Jim aren't worth arguing with. If you would like to discuss your fractal antennas, I'm all ears. -- Rick C No. Ignoring such comments in the age of eternal archiving doesn't work. Its CYBERBULLYING. I am a very sane person with resources behind me. I am in a position to stop it. And that starts with calling some of you folks on that point. If you find that distasteful, then ask why you wanted me back in the first place. Advice your mother gave you when being called names doesn't work in such archival permanence. It akin to Germany ignoring Hitler in 1930.... heck, just ignore 'em. Right? I'm not going to keep arguing with you about this, but I think it is clear that your sanity can be questioned regarding your OCD-like behavior. Actually your mom's advice is perfectly appropriate in newsgroups. It's just a bunch of people saying what they feel like saying of no consequence. They are quite easy to ignore. I do it all the time. I dare you to ignore this post. :) -- Rick C So NOW I am not only a candidate for abuse, but OCD as well! Hahahah! Sorry friend, I am deliberately choosing to be direct here. No compulsion at all. And I certainly have no mental illness. Why don't you dig out my medical record to show your accusation has a basis? ANSWER: Nah. Not there. SOme of you guys are just old men, IMO, who are reverting to your (unhappy?) childhood and trying to bring other people--making constructive contributions to society- down. You just alarmed that you are being called on it. |
Where's Chip when you need him!
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 9:16:13 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very low volume groups like this one. Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen. -- Jim Pennino If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape. What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead. No, I meant exactly what I said. snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble -- Jim Pennino I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO. But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic. How old are you, Jim? Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting. So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on others; hardly surprising. snip remaining babble -- Jim Pennino Go drink your prune juice, dear. Grow up child. -- Jim Pennino |
Where's Chip when you need him!
wrote:
On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 9:16:13 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-4, wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 7:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 6:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote: wrote: As for me, I have no complaints on 'time', such as Jim points out. Point totally and utterly missed; the older the post the less likely the original poster is still around and this is particularly true for very low volume groups like this one. Responding to very old posts seems to be a trait of clueless goggle groups users as real news readers will expire old posts so they aren't seen. -- Jim Pennino If I'm clueless, Jim, then the whole world is in one sorry shape. What you really mean is that most of those unsavory posters are dead. No, I meant exactly what I said. snip remaining self-aggrandizing babble -- Jim Pennino I am confident that you mean what you say. Its your caibration to reality on this matter that is lacking, IMO. But...some oldsters are challenged in that regard. Its important that future readers understand the demographic. How old are you, Jim? Never mind. My data base easily dug you out, along with the plane and all kinds of other info. Interesting. So you are an emotionally immature stalker who thinks they become empowered by doing web searches looking for personal information on others; hardly surprising. snip remaining babble -- Jim Pennino Of course the most interesting thing, Jim Pennino,WB6DKH, The interesting thing is that this child thinks he needs bloviate ad nauseam simply because it was pointed out to him that responding to old USENET posts is not a good idea. snip pointless verbal spew -- Jim Pennino |
Where's Chip when you need him!
rickman wrote:
On 4/23/2017 9:06 PM, wrote: Why you are trying to start an arguement over this simple fact is irrelevant to me. It takes two to tango. And apparently sometimes three. -- Jim Pennino |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com