Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dr. Slick" wrote in message om... W5DXP wrote in message ... Remember the maximum power transfer theorem? The transmitter probably works better into some impedances than into others. With an SWR of 1.4:1, the transmitter will see a resistance between 35.7 ohms and 70 ohms with a reactance between zero and about plus or minus j15. Knowing the frequency and VF of the RG-8X, you should be able to estimate the two impedances seen by the transmitter. Actually, i read off of my Smith Chart about +/- j20, but you are close. Anyhow, my point is that the ham "wife's tale" of adjusting the coax length for lowest SWR may be truly just a tale. I hope this is a wifes tale that has long been discredited. Trimming cable changes the impedance seen by the transmitter with no change to SWR. It is true that there are a lot of people who dont understand the difference. However, in my case, the SWR doesn't change much, while the INCIDENT power does!!! To me, this may be due to the fact that the PA isn't 50 Ohms at the output (I'll bet not many really are), and so a swing of +/- j20 may improve or degrade how close you are to a conjugate match. What do you dudes think? Dr. Slick |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jimmy wrote:
I hope this is a wifes tale that has long been discredited. Trimming cable changes the impedance seen by the transmitter with no change to SWR. However, a 50 ohm SWR meter reading will change as one changes the length of the ladder-line. When the 50 ohm SWR meter reads 1:1, the transmitter is seeing 50 ohms. That's how I tune my dipole. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |