Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"W5DXP" wrote in message ... Dr. Slick wrote: I didn't think you could tell us. I've never seen an SWR meter that you could "calibrate" to 50 or 75 ohms, or less. The calibration of the SWR meter is controlled by the internal sampling load resistor, the 'R' in Peter's V + IR equation. I have a home-brewed SWR meter that measures SWR on both balanced 450 ohm feedlines and on 300 ohm feedlines simply by changing the internal load resistors. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Cecil, When you do this, does the scale still display the correct SWR for conditions other than 1:1 ? Tam/WB2TT |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tarmo Tammaru wrote:
"W5DXP" wrote: The calibration of the SWR meter is controlled by the internal sampling load resistor, the 'R' in Peter's V + IR equation. I have a home-brewed SWR meter that measures SWR on both balanced 450 ohm feedlines and on 300 ohm feedlines simply by changing the internal load resistors. When you do this, does the scale still display the correct SWR for conditions other than 1:1 ? The scale is calibrated using known loads so yes, it displays the correct SWR up to 5.83:1. Above 5.83:1 the resolution of the scale is poor because the full scale SWR is infinity. I have marks at 5.83:1 and 10:1. 5.83:1 is where the reflected power equals half the forward power. Incidentally, the Z0 of my '450' ohm ladder- line is closer to 388 ohms. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |