Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
W5DXP wrote in message ...
Dr. Slick wrote: Your vocabulary is very confusing here, Cecil. "Incident" usually refers to the forward power, so when you say "incident reflected" it's extremely confusing. "Forward power incident upon the load" or "Reflected power incident upon the source" makes sense to me. Given the definition of "incident", the reflected power has to be incident upon something. Simply replace "incident upon" with "arriving at". "Forward Incident" a bit redundant in my opinion. "Incident" usually refers to the power moving towards the load, away from the generator. And your previous quote was: "It seems pretty obvious that not all PA's are Z0-matched so they will always re-reflect 100% of the incident reflected power." So here, you don't say where it is "incident" upon, of where it is arriving at, athough I assume you mean simply the reflected power. I'm just trying to make your vocabulary less confusing. Slick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Dr. Slick wrote:
"Forward Incident" a bit redundant in my opinion. "Incident" usually refers to the power moving towards the load, away from the generator. I don't think that is true. The HP ap note, AN 95-1, refers to "the voltage wave incident on port 1" and "the voltage wave incident on port 2". Those two waves are moving in opposite directions, one toward the load and one toward the source. -- 73, Cecil, W5DXP -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |