Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tarmo Tammaru wrote:
Try this out. You have an amplifier of unknown source impedance connected through a directional meter to a 1/4 wavelength line that is shorted at the far end. Without knowing about SWR, you know (because you are a ham radio operator) that the amp is driving an infinite impedance, and delivering 0 power. Now if you adjust the amp so the meter reads 100W in both directions, the amp is still delivering 0 power, and 100% of the reflected wave is rereflected. Where did the 100W come from? the amp delivered it during the first 1/2 cycle after it was turned on. It didn't "know" the line was shorted until the first reflection came back. How do you know that the amplifier is not "delivering" 100W of forward power and dissipating 100W of reflected power (as it would with a circulator+load)? How do you prove that the impedance looking back into the amp is zero, infinity, or purely reactive? Doesn't it have everything to do with the arbitrary definition of "delivered" which doesn't necessarily match reality? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |