| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dr. Slick wrote:
How would you explain what Cecil wrote? How are some people improving SWR by changing coax length, when in theory they shouldn't be able to do this? If I were using a 450 ohm SWR meter on 450 ohm Z0 feedline, the SWR meter would indicate no change in SWR as I change the feedline length. Assuming the 450 ohm SWR meter is accurate, the indicated SWR and the actual SWR are the same. When I use a 50 ohm SWR meter on 450 ohm Z0 feedline, the SWR meter is NOT indicating the true SWR on the 450 ohm feedline. It is indicating what the SWR would be if the line were Z0=50 ohms. All it is indicating is the impedance seen by the transmitter which indeed does change with feedline length in a system with reflections. Theoretically, the SWR on a feedline changes only slightly with changing feedline length and that is because of additional losses in the feedline as the length is increased. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
| The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna | |||