Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/30/2014 1:22 AM, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote in news:lr9ohj$33f$1@dont- email.me: But the amplifier you're trying to use is meant to feed a receiver directly, not another antenna. So output is going to be very low (on the order of microwatts) - much lower than any amplifier which feeds an antenna. Small point, but.... Microwatts. Those new legal microstransmitters are said to be in NANOwatt range output, but allegedly work on the distance scales I'm interested in. Microwatts should certainly have worked, but despite the crude test dipole being good (on standard wired reception test anyway), it didn't work for transmitting even a foot or two with the radio's whip parallel to the upper part of it. If nanowatts should have, the MAR-6 looks like driving picowatts, if I'm lucky. ![]() I would suggest you check again. Receivers aren't that sensitive. Most unlicensed transmitters are in the 100-500 mw range, and have a coverage of maybe 100 feet. And picowatts aren't even worth discussing. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WCBS-FM ralliers get rates boost | Broadcasting | |||
Funding Boost for Radio New Zealand International | Shortwave | |||
Advice Needed: How to boost signal on 2.4 ghz av unit | Equipment | |||
PrePaid Boost/Nextel Special | Swap | |||
FS PRE-PAID BOOST/NEXTEL | Swap |