Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2014 8:45 AM, rickman wrote:
On 8/1/2014 8:00 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 8/1/2014 12:37 AM, rickman wrote: On 7/31/2014 9:47 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 7/31/2014 9:29 PM, rickman wrote: On 7/30/2014 9:40 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 7/30/2014 1:22 AM, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Jerry Stuckle wrote in news:lr9ohj$33f$1@dont- email.me: But the amplifier you're trying to use is meant to feed a receiver directly, not another antenna. So output is going to be very low (on the order of microwatts) - much lower than any amplifier which feeds an antenna. Small point, but.... Microwatts. Those new legal microstransmitters are said to be in NANOwatt range output, but allegedly work on the distance scales I'm interested in. Microwatts should certainly have worked, but despite the crude test dipole being good (on standard wired reception test anyway), it didn't work for transmitting even a foot or two with the radio's whip parallel to the upper part of it. If nanowatts should have, the MAR-6 looks like driving picowatts, if I'm lucky. ![]() I would suggest you check again. Receivers aren't that sensitive. Most unlicensed transmitters are in the 100-500 mw range, and have a coverage of maybe 100 feet. And picowatts aren't even worth discussing. I'm unclear, is mW microwatts or milliwatts as you wrote it? The reason I ask is that a 500 milliwatt transmitter would certainly have a receivable distance much greater than 100 feet, no? According to standards, mW is milliwatts. uW (actually, greek "mu"W but I'm not using a charset here that defines it, so the standard is "uW") would be microwatts. I'm not asking about the standard, I'm asking what you meant by mW. Why do you say with a power level of 500 mW (27 dBm) a transmitter would only have a range of 100 feet? With the low bandwidth we are discussing this seems to be *very* short. I follow the standards. Not much more than that. Remember - the commercial FM band has +/- 75kHZ deviation. Additionally, there are limits as to the antenna on Part 15 devices - you can't, for instance, place a 6db gain antenna 200' in the air. Realtors around here use them to advertise houses; they place one in the house with a recording that describes the house with a sign out front showing the frequency. Reception from the street is typically within a couple of houses either side. Our college radio station ran 10 watts to a 3db gain antenna on top of one of the dorms. The dorm was only 3 stories plus attic, so the antenna was maybe 40-45 feet in the air. Good coverage was about a 2-3 mile radius with a typical portable receiver (or car); an external antenna on the receiver obviously extended that. Ok, if you are talking about 500 milliWatts, how do you get 100 feet from that? Portable receivers have notoriously poor antennas and receive sensitivity. A whip antenna is better, but awkward. An external antenna on a good receiver will receive a fair amount further - but that's not portable. Plus building, etc. will attenuate the signal (concrete is really bad - add steel rebar and it's even worse). Like anything else - you *can* get farther than 100 feet, but that's about all you can expect reliably. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WCBS-FM ralliers get rates boost | Broadcasting | |||
Funding Boost for Radio New Zealand International | Shortwave | |||
Advice Needed: How to boost signal on 2.4 ghz av unit | Equipment | |||
PrePaid Boost/Nextel Special | Swap | |||
FS PRE-PAID BOOST/NEXTEL | Swap |