Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() JGBOYLES wrote: But okay, the thing worked. The authors concluded that what they had was a tuned circuit on the end of some coax, and the coax radiated more so than the antenna. This sounds almost like aa halfwave antenna with it's tuned circuit. The problem with the EH and CFA as has been pointed out many times is the claim to provide Electromagnetic radiation through Poynting Vector Synthesis. They produce the E and H field seperately and combine the two in the antenna to produce EM radiation. The claim is with this Synthesis, high radiation efficiency is produced from a very small antenna, the Holy Grail, a small efficient antenna. Hmm, maybe Occam's razor should be invoked? If someone gets results from one of these antennas, it is due to feedline radiation, so they will proclaim "it works". But it does not work because of Poynting Vector Synthesis as claimed. There are a number of ways to get your feedline to radiate, the EH antenna could be one of the better ones, along with the commercial Bilal Isotron. At least the Isotrons are kinda cool looking... 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |