Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph Mowery wrote:
wrote in message ... I've done a lot of modeling with V's and inverted V's. Except for a slight diffenence due to ground effects at low heights, there is no difference between them. As the angle goes from 180 degrees, i.e. a dipole, the impedance goes down and and the pattern spreads out. I have not played with the programs , but often wondered what the effect is on antennas that are suported on the ends and the middle is dropped in a U or V shape and not the inverted V shape. Many antenna books and articals seem to show the flat top and inverted V paterns, but I have not seen any with the actual V type. Like I said, there is no difference in free space between a V and an inverted V. There are slight differences when close to ground. -- Jim Pennino |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Real Oil Drillers Discuss MC 252 | Shortwave | |||
Discuss about books | Shortwave | |||
OT , You may need to discuss this . | CB | |||
Anyone care to discuss... | CB | |||
Art Bell to discuss BPL on C-to-C AM TONIGHT (??) 3/20/04 | Policy |