Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Setting aside the mistaken belief that even licensees of several years'
standing have that a short antenna will radiate all the power that is fed to it, even long antennae do not do that! Consider the terminated and very-directional Rhombic with legs that are several wavelengths long; the reason for the termination is to absorb the power that does not get radiated and to prevent it being reflected and so making the Rhombic bi-directional instead of uni-directional.. Also, consider the following, if shorter (than the Rhombic) antennae radiate all the power fed to them, there would be no advantage to extending the length of any antenna because the shorter bit would have radiated all the power, and there'd be nothing left for the longer bit to radiate. As it is short (and unterminated) antennae only radiate a small proportion of the power that is fed to them, and that which is not radiated is refelcted back to the feed point considerably out-of-phase with the incident power and so presenting a very reactive impedance. (Yes, OK, on the way back from the reflection, a bit more might get radiated, but I suspect that the out-of-phase wave affects the EM fields thereby reducing the radiative capability) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Minimum Wage Myths? Typical Media Misinformation? | Shortwave | |||
Welcome to Legends 1680AM Radio | Shortwave | |||
Reality, "Slippery Facts, and Myths | Policy | |||
Jon Cunningham reposts old urban legends | Shortwave |