LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old October 26th 14, 08:26 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 393
Default Myths and Legends of Antennae

On 26/10/14 17:44, wrote:
gareth wrote:
Setting aside the mistaken belief that even licensees of several years'
standing
have that a short antenna will radiate all the power that is fed to it, even
long
antennae do not do that!


Ignoring the nonsense about licensees and looking at what physicists have
to say about antennas, we find that all antennas radiate all the power
applied to them minus any resistive loss.


Which is exactly what was posted by those who posted correct inputs said.

As usual, Evans is posting malicious nonsense.


Consider the terminated and very-directional Rhombic with legs that are
several
wavelengths long; the reason for the termination is to absorb the power that
does not
get radiated and to prevent it being reflected and so making the Rhombic
bi-directional
instead of uni-directional..

Also, consider the following, if shorter (than the Rhombic) antennae radiate
all the
power fed to them, there would be no advantage to extending the length of
any antenna
because the shorter bit would have radiated all the power, and there'd be
nothing left
for the longer bit to radiate.


A ridiculous conclusiong that totally ignores both antenna pattern and
the practical issues involved in feeding very short antennas.


He lacks even a grasp of the most basic antenna theory.


As it is short (and unterminated) antennae only radiate a small proportion
of the power that
is fed to them, and that which is not radiated is refelcted back to the feed
point considerably
out-of-phase with the incident power and so presenting a very reactive
impedance. (Yes, OK,
on the way back from the reflection, a bit more might get radiated, but I
suspect that the
out-of-phase wave affects the EM fields thereby reducing the radiative
capability)


All a giant pile of babbling, confused nonsense that shows a total lack
of understanding of how antennas work.


One of his standard ploys is to utter a load of such techno-nonsense.
Another is to hurl abuse. He has less pleasant ploys which, hopefully,
you will be spared.







 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. gareth Antenna 119 February 24th 15 09:54 AM
Minimum Wage Myths? Typical Media Misinformation? Editor RadioTalkingPoints Shortwave 0 October 18th 09 05:07 PM
Welcome to Legends 1680AM Radio RHF Shortwave 7 July 13th 08 08:41 AM
Reality, "Slippery Facts, and Myths John Smith Policy 13 August 9th 05 06:16 PM
Jon Cunningham reposts old urban legends Hoagues 300 dinars Shortwave 3 July 13th 04 01:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017