| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Stephen Thomas Cole" wrote in message
... He really doesn't do well with being proven wrong, does he? The sooner that the good folk of .antenna realise that the best way to deal with the drooling moron is to shun him, the sooner that their group will revert to a place of sanity and accurate physics, as Big G will quickly move on to upset another group in his search for attention. I reckon he's about due another stint telling the respected experts in the DSP groups where they've been going wrong their whole lives. Why not contribute your own technically based rebuttal instead of merely reporting here that I have posted there? Were you unaware of the resistive termination of a Rhombic that is necessary if you wish it to be uni-directional instead of bi-directional? A technical response from you would be far better for the health of amateur radio in general and these NG in particular instead of the infantile obsession with which you seem to express your envy of me on a daily basis. On the matter of seeking attention, as your post above is neither relevant not technical, I suspect just a teensy-weensy bit that seeking attention is your emotive maladjustment, and not mine? |
Big G at it again in .antenna
En el artículo , FranK Turner-Smith
G3VKI escribió: Beanie, exactly WHAT do you think you have that anybody may envy? Your 3 digit BMI, perhaps, or your 1 digit IQ? More like a 3-digit RSI from too much wanking. -- (\_/) (='.'=) (")_(") |
Big G at it again in .antenna
"gareth" wrote in message
... A technical response from you would be far better for the health of amateur radio in general and these NG in particular instead of the infantile obsession with which you seem to express your envy of me on a daily basis. Beanie, exactly WHAT do you think you have that anybody may envy? Your 3 digit BMI, perhaps, or your 1 digit IQ? -- ;-) .. 73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint. .. http://turner-smith.co.uk |
Big G at it again in .antenna
Mike Tomlinson wrote in
: RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. :) |
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Mike Tomlinson" wrote in message
... En el artículo , FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI escribió: Beanie, exactly WHAT do you think you have that anybody may envy? Your 3 digit BMI, perhaps, or your 1 digit IQ? More like a 3-digit RSI from too much wanking. You say that you are in regular touch with the We'll ****e (All over you) conplodulary so why not apply to join their ranks as you exhibit the same aggressive, anti-social and infantile attitudes that is the mark of their mien. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:16:25 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
Mike Tomlinson wrote in : RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. :) That's an initialism http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/initialism An acronym is something like RADAR Radio Detection And Ranging, or GARETH Gormless Amateur Radio Enthusiast Total Headcase. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 10/26/2014 6:21 PM, Clod's Conscience wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:16:25 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Mike Tomlinson wrote in : RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. :) That's an initialism http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/initialism An acronym is something like RADAR Radio Detection And Ranging, or GARETH Gormless Amateur Radio Enthusiast Total Headcase. LOL! -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 10/26/2014 8:46 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 10/26/2014 6:21 PM, Clod's Conscience wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:16:25 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Mike Tomlinson wrote in : RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. :) That's an initialism http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/initialism An acronym is something like RADAR Radio Detection And Ranging, or GARETH Gormless Amateur Radio Enthusiast Total Headcase. LOL! Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? -- Rick |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 10/26/2014 9:02 PM, rickman wrote:
On 10/26/2014 8:46 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 10/26/2014 6:21 PM, Clod's Conscience wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:16:25 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Mike Tomlinson wrote in : RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. :) That's an initialism http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/initialism An acronym is something like RADAR Radio Detection And Ranging, or GARETH Gormless Amateur Radio Enthusiast Total Headcase. LOL! Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? Sure - when the big G doesn't promote ideas which violate the laws of physics... -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 27/10/14 01:02, rickman wrote:
On 10/26/2014 8:46 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 10/26/2014 6:21 PM, Clod's Conscience wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:16:25 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Mike Tomlinson wrote in : RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. :) That's an initialism http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/initialism An acronym is something like RADAR Radio Detection And Ranging, or GARETH Gormless Amateur Radio Enthusiast Total Headcase. LOL! Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? We try, but Evans and his chums usually jump in and ruin the thread. There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 10/26/2014 9:20 PM, Brian Reay wrote:
On 27/10/14 01:02, rickman wrote: On 10/26/2014 8:46 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 10/26/2014 6:21 PM, Clod's Conscience wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:16:25 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Mike Tomlinson wrote in : RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. :) That's an initialism http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/initialism An acronym is something like RADAR Radio Detection And Ranging, or GARETH Gormless Amateur Radio Enthusiast Total Headcase. LOL! Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? We try, but Evans and his chums usually jump in and ruin the thread. There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Brian, Actually, I do think they are attempts of technical threads, within his limited capacity of understanding. But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 10/26/2014 9:34 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 10/26/2014 9:20 PM, Brian Reay wrote: On 27/10/14 01:02, rickman wrote: On 10/26/2014 8:46 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 10/26/2014 6:21 PM, Clod's Conscience wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:16:25 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Mike Tomlinson wrote in : RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. :) That's an initialism http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/initialism An acronym is something like RADAR Radio Detection And Ranging, or GARETH Gormless Amateur Radio Enthusiast Total Headcase. LOL! Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? We try, but Evans and his chums usually jump in and ruin the thread. There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Brian, Actually, I do think they are attempts of technical threads, within his limited capacity of understanding. But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. So why do the rest of you have to act like children as well? Why not just ignore him? I seem to recall that you have stated that you take pleasure in jousting with him. Or do I have you mixed up with someone else? The bottom line is that by arguing with him endlessly it ruins the group for everyone else every bit as much as he does, if not more. If it were just him he would be easy to ignore. The topics he brings up could be discussed without all the back and forth banter. Just treat him as if he were the devil incarnate and refuse to even look his way much less mention his name! -- Rick |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 27/10/14 01:02, rickman wrote:
Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? UKRA used to be a lively and interesting AR group, before those that claimed it was a 'cesspit' started to believe their own rhetoric and then tried to turn it into one. The rec.radio.amateur.* series is basically a wasteland of cross-posted blogs and newsletters; if they were merged into one single group at least it would spare the bandwidth wasted in the cross-posting. Time for a US-based RFD, perhaps. I understand that the person who had a hand in cleaning them up from whatever they were suffering from before now indirectly has a hand in trying to clean up ukra by proposing a parallel moderated group, and perhaps the above is the reason so little UK-based support has emerged for the proposal. -- Spike "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding" Louis D. Brandeis |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 27/10/14 01:02, rickman wrote:
Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? Not really. Previously the group was used as a soapbox where big-ego big-mouths expounded their latest OT conspiracy theories, but the egotistical Napoleon types are now using most of their energies to oppose the creation of the moderated group - I wonder why? |
Big G at it again in .antenna
In message
, Brian Reay writes Jerry Stuckle wrote: There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Brian, Actually, I do think they are attempts of technical threads, within his limited capacity of understanding. But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. His understanding is certainly limited, there is other evidence to support that, but as for attempts at improving understanding, why does recycle the same topics again and again? Some have been around the block several times, even though they have been explained. He makes no attempt to digest the responses he receives, beyond twisting highlights to further his barrage of abuse. Why is this obvious? Well, he rubbishes perfectly valid answers and even, on occasions, goes on to rewrite history as if he has 'found a book' which explains things. The question is, why? Do a search for Westinghouse in the archive of uk.railway I really think that Rick's advice is best, although I wouldn't go as far as to "treat him as if he were the devil incarnate and refuse to even look his way much less mention his name". He has, on the odd occasion, some very valid points to make. However, you have to be careful, as this is sometimes just a ploy (conscious or otherwise) to draw you into what you think is a normal, civilised discussion, and it rapidly turns out not to be. The important thing is not prolong pointless arguments, otherwise you risk getting tarred with the same brush. -- Ian |
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... We try, but Evans and his chums usually jump in and ruin the thread. There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Once again, the origination of abuse comes from you. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... His understanding is certainly limited, there is other evidence to support that, but as for attempts at improving understanding, why does recycle the same topics again and again? Some have been around the block several times, even though they have been explained. He makes no attempt to digest the responses he receives, beyond twisting highlights to further his barrage of abuse. Why is this obvious? Well, he rubbishes perfectly valid answers and even, on occasions, goes on to rewrite history as if he has 'found a book' which explains things. The question is, why? Do a search for Westinghouse in the archive of uk.railway Once again, the abuse originates with you such that you seem to have a particularly unhealthy obsession with me to the extent that all your contributions to technical NG are abusive. Physician, heal thyself. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
... He has, on the odd occasion, some very valid points to make. I always have valid points to make. However, you have to be careful, as this is sometimes just a ploy (conscious or otherwise) to draw you into what you think is a normal, civilised discussion, and it rapidly turns out not to be. Completely untrue. It is a device of the gratuitously abusive to justify their own abusive psyches by claiming that my intention is to cause abuse, which it has never been in 20 years of subscribing to Usenet. By expressing such an opinion, you are allowing yourself to be brainwashed by reay. The important thing is not prolong pointless arguments, otherwise you risk getting tarred with the same brush. Agree absolutely, but technical discussions are not pointless arguments. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:02:29 -0400, rickman wrote:
Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? It does happen :-) But along come the insult throwers and all hell breaks out. It's like the school playground when teacher goes behind the bike shed for smoke. -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:34:08 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. Watching from the sidelines I see the insults flying in all directions. If someone has made an error there are good ways and bad ways of pointing that out as any parent will know. What we normally see here is the bad way which usually involves attacking the person rather than the idea. -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Wymsey" wrote in message
... On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 21:02:29 -0400, rickman wrote: Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? It does happen :-) But along come the insult throwers and all hell breaks out. It's like the school playground when teacher goes behind the bike shed for smoke. The prefects used to confiscate our fags and smoke them themselves in the Prefects Room. They even got First Formers to empty the ash trays. A knock-on from the "fagging" days, perhaps? -- ;-) .. 73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint. .. http://turner-smith.co.uk |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 27/10/14 08:45, Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Brian Reay writes Jerry Stuckle wrote: There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Brian, Actually, I do think they are attempts of technical threads, within his limited capacity of understanding. But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. His understanding is certainly limited, there is other evidence to support that, but as for attempts at improving understanding, why does recycle the same topics again and again? Some have been around the block several times, even though they have been explained. He makes no attempt to digest the responses he receives, beyond twisting highlights to further his barrage of abuse. Why is this obvious? Well, he rubbishes perfectly valid answers and even, on occasions, goes on to rewrite history as if he has 'found a book' which explains things. The question is, why? Do a search for Westinghouse in the archive of uk.railway I really think that Rick's advice is best, although I wouldn't go as far as to "treat him as if he were the devil incarnate and refuse to even look his way much less mention his name". He has, on the odd occasion, some very valid points to make. However, you have to be careful, as this is sometimes just a ploy (conscious or otherwise) to draw you into what you think is a normal, civilised discussion, and it rapidly turns out not to be. The important thing is not prolong pointless arguments, otherwise you risk getting tarred with the same brush. Which is why I make a point of not replying to Evans. OTOH, if others are involved, I'm happy to discuss the topics with then, of course. Sadly, this results in abuse from Evans but we can't let him 'censor' by injecting abuse. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 10/26/2014 11:27 PM, rickman wrote:
On 10/26/2014 9:34 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 10/26/2014 9:20 PM, Brian Reay wrote: On 27/10/14 01:02, rickman wrote: On 10/26/2014 8:46 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote: On 10/26/2014 6:21 PM, Clod's Conscience wrote: On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 17:16:25 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote: Mike Tomlinson wrote in : RSI Never mind RSI, the acronym for the rest of that is TMI. :) That's an initialism http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/initialism An acronym is something like RADAR Radio Detection And Ranging, or GARETH Gormless Amateur Radio Enthusiast Total Headcase. LOL! Does anyone ever talk about amateur radio in these groups? We try, but Evans and his chums usually jump in and ruin the thread. There are moderated groups where he can't get up to his tricks. You've seen his false attempts at technical threads, they are no more than vehicles for abuse, as you've seen. Brian, Actually, I do think they are attempts of technical threads, within his limited capacity of understanding. But they quickly result in abusive responses when his fallacies are pointed out. So why do the rest of you have to act like children as well? Why not just ignore him? I seem to recall that you have stated that you take pleasure in jousting with him. Or do I have you mixed up with someone else? The bottom line is that by arguing with him endlessly it ruins the group for everyone else every bit as much as he does, if not more. If it were just him he would be easy to ignore. The topics he brings up could be discussed without all the back and forth banter. Just treat him as if he were the devil incarnate and refuse to even look his way much less mention his name! You have me mixed up with someone else. But then why do YOU keep these threads going? -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Big G at it again in .antenna
In message , Brian Reay writes
Which is why I make a point of not replying to Evans. Maybe not directly, but where possible, I'd also try to refrain from making unnecessary references to historical events - except maybe (for example) when engaged in light-hearted banter and general humorous skit. However, even this may be interpreted by some as being personal attacks. Personally, I would suggest that all posters in this NG adopt a style that would be likely to pass moderation in the forthcoming uk.r.a.m. -- Ian |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:12:28 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Brian Reay writes Which is why I make a point of not replying to Evans. Maybe not directly, but where possible, I'd also try to refrain from making unnecessary references to historical events - except maybe (for example) when engaged in light-hearted banter and general humorous skit. However, even this may be interpreted by some as being personal attacks. Are you saying that we should treat him as we would a loony on a bus? |
Big G at it again in .antenna
In message , Radiohead70
writes On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:12:28 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Brian Reay writes Which is why I make a point of not replying to Evans. Maybe not directly, but where possible, I'd also try to refrain from making unnecessary references to historical events - except maybe (for example) when engaged in light-hearted banter and general humorous skit. However, even this may be interpreted by some as being personal attacks. Are you saying that we should treat him as we would a loony on a bus? *You* might think that, but *I* couldn't possibly comment. -- Ian |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:12:28 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
Maybe not directly, but where possible, I'd also try to refrain from making unnecessary references to historical events Here, blooming, here! It's so damn tedious. -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:02:45 +0000, FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote:
The prefects used to confiscate our fags and smoke them themselves in the Prefects Room. That used to happened to me too so one day a friend and I picked up some dog ends and rolled them in fags - nearly got thoroughly beaten up when the prefect tried to smoke one! -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:21:25 +0000, Wymsey wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:12:28 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: Maybe not directly, but where possible, I'd also try to refrain from making unnecessary references to historical events Here, blooming, here! It's so damn tedious. Yeah, 1066 what a bummer of a year that was. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
Radiohead70 wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:12:28 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Brian Reay writes Which is why I make a point of not replying to Evans. Maybe not directly, but where possible, I'd also try to refrain from making unnecessary references to historical events - except maybe (for example) when engaged in light-hearted banter and general humorous skit. However, even this may be interpreted by some as being personal attacks. Are you saying that we should treat him as we would a loony on a bus? Yes, that's right Gareth. That's how he's saying we should treat you. -- Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:29:01 +0000, Anton Deque wrote:
Yeah, 1066 what a bummer of a year that was. Not for Norman! -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Which is why I make a point of not replying to Evans. OTOH, if others are involved, I'm happy to discuss the topics with then, of course. Sadly, this results in abuse from Evans but we can't let him 'censor' by injecting abuse. You are obsessed with the idea that I am responsible for originating abuse, which I never am. You, however, are very free with personal abusive remarks, as above. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
Wymsey wrote in :
Not for Norman! DINSDALE!!! |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On 27/10/14 12:37, Radiohead70 wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:12:28 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: In message , Brian Reay writes Which is why I make a point of not replying to Evans. Maybe not directly, but where possible, I'd also try to refrain from making unnecessary references to historical events - except maybe (for example) when engaged in light-hearted banter and general humorous skit. However, even this may be interpreted by some as being personal attacks. Are you saying that we should treat him as we would a loony on a bus? Yes. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:37:16 +0000, Radiohead70 wrote:
Are you saying that we should treat him as we would a loony on a bus? Sure, be kind and helpful. Don't scorn or scoff. -- M0WYM Sales @ radiowymsey http://stores.ebay.co.uk/Sales-At-Radio-Wymsey/ |
Big G at it again in .antenna
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
... Are you saying that we should treat him as we would a loony on a bus? Yes. Once again, it is from your own keyboard that the abuse originates. You seem to have been more and more desperate these past few days to sling mud in my direction. Are you having a bad time over something and are trying to divert attention away from yourself, perhaps? |
Big G at it again in .antenna
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 14:01:26 +0000, gareth wrote:
You are obsessed with the idea that I am responsible for originating abuse, Oh, the irony. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
"gareth" wrote in news:m2lqjc$7g8$1@dont-
email.me: Are you saying that we should treat him as we would a loony on a bus? Yes. Once again, it is from your own keyboard that the abuse originates. Ok, last question of mine was a philosophical one that didn't work, so I'll try a new tack: How many people need to know the score, who do not already know it, and who will be ariving here especially, avidly, waiting with bated breath to learn the gory and sordid details? It really IS time to let it rest. Given that all the people after a moderated group are basically just people tired of this, wanting to go to another room and quietly close the door, I don't blame them, and some alternative would be a good thing. And it thei insist of keeping thsi noise out of that room, I see no fault in that either. Whenever I have got bitter about some kind of online dispute I just go somewhere else, and do somethign else, especially when it's an obvious case of flogging dead horses. Act unilaterally. It's the fastest way to learn who isn't capable or willing to act. |
Big G at it again in .antenna
Lostgallifreyan wrote:
"gareth" wrote in news:m2lqjc$7g8$1@dont- email.me: Are you saying that we should treat him as we would a loony on a bus? Yes. Once again, it is from your own keyboard that the abuse originates. Ok, last question of mine was a philosophical one that didn't work, so I'll try a new tack: How many people need to know the score, who do not already know it, and who will be ariving here especially, avidly, waiting with bated breath to learn the gory and sordid details? It really IS time to let it rest. Given that all the people after a moderated group are basically just people tired of this, wanting to go to another room and quietly close the door, I don't blame them, and some alternative would be a good thing. And it thei insist of keeping thsi noise out of that room, I see no fault in that either. Whenever I have got bitter about some kind of online dispute I just go somewhere else, and do somethign else, especially when it's an obvious case of flogging dead horses. Act unilaterally. It's the fastest way to learn who isn't capable or willing to act. I have purposefully been trimming .antenna from my replies to this thread as I have no desire to propagate the degeneracy of Gareth Alun Evans G4SDW beyond the squalid confines of ukra. As you've seen, however, Gareth has no shame whatsoever in destroying newsgroups. He's been doing it for nearly two decades. I used to think that Gareth was some kind of genius performance artist, perpetuating a collosal joke at all of our expense. Then I read the various newspaper reports and Usenet postings of his various brushes with the law, his triumph at the suicide of the police officer who had to restrain him with a boot to the head (a suicide which was in no small part a result of Gareth's baseless complaints against the officer), his vile comments re two murdered primary school girls, his multiple vendettas against other radio amateurs often culminating in trying to have them sacked by way of insinuating pedophilia/sexual issues in letters to their employers, physical assault to his postman, and so on, and so on. And I realised that he absolutely was not playing some kind of huge prank. He was just deranged. Psychotic, perhaps. Gareth is a genuinely unhinged person. I hope that that's becoming clearer to you all the more gibberish he posts to your group. You'll never manage to engage with him on any kind of human level, he just isn't capable. -- Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone |
Big G at it again in .antenna
Stephen Thomas Cole wrote in
: You'll never manage to engage with him on any kind of human level, he just isn't capable. That may well be so, but I was suggesting my notion to all who will read it and who may think it time it was tried. If Gareth becomes a real danger, there is enough history to guide new predent. This is not a judgement I am qualified or informed enough to make, no matter what I learn here. I am convinced the matter is serious though, and that it is time everyone thought seriously about their part in it. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:37 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com