Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30/10/14 22:26, Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , Ralph Mowery writes "Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... The original proposal in this thread was that long antennas performed better than short ones. If that was true you'd get a good 600MHz UHF TV picture using a 132ft end fed longwire. I've not tried it, but it doesn't seem very likely. A 132' endfed will have one hell of a gain on 600MHz - but it will be almost straight off the ends. -- Ian I know the gain will be off the end of the wire, but still wonder if an antenna that long (in wavelengths) will actually work or will it be too long and the gain does not meet the expectations or if programs like NEC will predict it or fall apart. On that point, you'll have to ask the experts! The gain would be at the cost of a very narrow front lobe. You'd need a big rotator. -- ;-) .. 73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint. .. http://turner-smith.co.uk .. Ubuntu 12.04 Thunderbirds are go. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
The philosophy of short antennae | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna | |||
Coaxial Collinear... To short or not to short | Antenna |