Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph Mowery wrote:
"Ian Jackson" wrote in message ... The original proposal in this thread was that long antennas performed better than short ones. If that was true you'd get a good 600MHz UHF TV picture using a 132ft end fed longwire. I've not tried it, but it doesn't seem very likely. A 132' endfed will have one hell of a gain on 600MHz - but it will be almost straight off the ends. -- Ian I know the gain will be off the end of the wire, but still wonder if an antenna that long (in wavelengths) will actually work or will it be too long and the gain does not meet the expectations or if programs like NEC will predict it or fall apart. EZNEC handles it just fine. I modeled a 120' (I had forgotten the exact number posted) long wire at 6' over real ground at 600 Mhz: Impedance: 55-j308 Max vertical gain: 21 dBi at 4 degrees Horizontal gain: two 21 dBi lobes at +/- 4 degrees Front/back: 9.5 dB LOTS of little lobes... -- Jim Pennino |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
The philosophy of short antennae | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna | |||
Coaxial Collinear... To short or not to short | Antenna |