Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31/10/14 21:22, Ralph Mowery wrote:
"Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message . .. Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote in : This cross polarisation provided about 26dB protection against co-channel interference. That's a useful figure. I asked a few weeks ago about the prospects of wiring an external vertical dipole for FM VHF broadcasts, via a MAR6 based amplifier boosting by maybe 20dB, to an internal horizontal dipole to overcome local digital hash from nearby flats that gets in to degrade the signal from a portable radio with a telescopic whip. As it is the SNR rather than the raw strength which is an issue, an ideal situation would be to allow the whip to be in its resting horizontal, contracted position, while still allowing clear use of radios carried around the flat while I work. Theory say infinite, but in practice it won't happen. Just too many reflections, especially on the low bands where the signal reflects many times over a long distance. Here are some numbers if there are no reflections to upset theory. deg difference in dB 20 54 30 1.25 45 3 60 6 70 9.32 80 15.2 90 infinity This also holds up for right hand and left hand circular. There is another modification if the antennas are separated vertically or horizontal. You usually get lots more isolation if the antennas are mounted one above the other instead of horizontal. Are you sure about the 20 degree difference? Should it have been 5.4dB? -- ;-) .. 73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint. .. http://turner-smith.co.uk .. Ubuntu 12.04 Thunderbirds are go. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
The philosophy of short antennae | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna | |||
Coaxial Collinear... To short or not to short | Antenna |