Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have stated my view that short antenna are poor radiatiors based
upon a number of physics and electromagnetics text books in my possession. Some have chosen to disagree, and repeatedly so, but their case is weakened because they produce no evidence and seem to want to rely on aggressive and abusive remarks in order to win the day. (I have no interest in winning the day, only in knowing the truth, which for me at the moment is that short antennae are poor radiators, and I have no need to resort to abuse to state that viewpoint) One is reminded of the religions of the world, firstly Christianity and latterly Islam that rely on violence to put their message across, but that reliance is surely an indication that their messages are false, for, if true, the message would stand up for itself. If you wanted everybody to profess falsehood, such as saying that 1 + 1 = 3, or that short antennae are as good radiatiors as long antennae, then you could only hope to get that message across by the propaganda of abuse, which is regrettably what we are seeing in this NG, by a number of people who, although they might now be wearing long trousers, have minds that are still wearing nappies / diapers. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
The philosophy of short antennae | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna | |||
Coaxial Collinear... To short or not to short | Antenna |