LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30   Report Post  
Old October 31st 14, 11:07 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 702
Default short antennae


"Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI" wrote in message
...
On 31/10/14 21:22, Ralph Mowery wrote:
Here are some numbers if there are no reflections to upset theory.
deg difference in dB

20 54
30 1.25
45 3
60 6
70 9.32
80 15.2
90 infinity

This also holds up for right hand and left hand circular.

There is another modification if the antennas are separated vertically or
horizontal. You usually get lots more isolation if the antennas are
mounted
one above the other instead of horizontal.


Are you sure about the 20 degree difference? Should it have been 5.4dB?


Yes, fat fingered the thing and missed putting in the decimal point.

:-)



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. gareth Antenna 119 February 24th 15 10:54 AM
The philosophy of short antennae gareth Antenna 3 October 28th 14 07:02 PM
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well gareth Antenna 18 October 28th 14 06:42 PM
Short Antennae gareth Antenna 10 October 11th 14 03:19 AM
Coaxial Collinear... To short or not to short [email protected] Antenna 0 February 11th 09 12:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017