On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 18:10:45 +0000, gareth wrote:

"Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message
. ..

Eh?

He thinks your writing style is deranged and your theories are total
nonsense. He also pleased that someone is willing to take the time to
expose your posts for the idiotic nonsense that they are, because leaving
you to post that sort of guff unchallenged could give a casual reader the
mistaken impression that you are in any way correct in your bizarre
assertions.

Bernie wrote in :

He thinks your writing style is deranged and your theories are total
nonsense. He also pleased that someone is willing to take the time to
expose your posts for the idiotic nonsense that they are, because leaving
you to post that sort of guff unchallenged could give a casual reader the
mistaken impression that you are in any way correct in your bizarre
assertions.



Concise. Which I can do, at times, but this wasn't one of them. Looks like
I was at leasi intelligible because you got it. Just one point though...
it's not aimed at Gareth, it's specifically aimed at supporting the
countering move. Not the same thing, because as I explained, there are
several other aspects of life where this matters.

On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 13:52:06 -0500, Lostgallifreyan wrote:

Bernie wrote in :

He thinks your writing style is deranged and your theories are total
nonsense. He also pleased that someone is willing to take the time to
expose your posts for the idiotic nonsense that they are, because
leaving you to post that sort of guff unchallenged could give a casual
reader the mistaken impression that you are in any way correct in your
bizarre assertions.



Concise. Which I can do, at times, but this wasn't one of them. Looks
like I was at leasi intelligible because you got it. Just one point
though... it's not aimed at Gareth, it's specifically aimed at
supporting the countering move. Not the same thing, because as I
explained, there are several other aspects of life where this matters.

I kept it short as I was worried about 'putting words in your mouth'. I
didn't mention the Chopin, either - doesn't matter how many times I hear
it, I never tire of Berceuse :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TQ-AXJZqtg

Bernie wrote in :

I never tire of Berceuse

Nice. I bet Satie knew that, there seems to be a link in his sound. For me
it's mainly the Etudes and Preludes that work best... Not sure why, and not
all either, mostly the lyrical Schubert-like ones, rather than the purely
virtuosic stuff, I remember watching my mum playing once, I just stood there,
and my mind got strongly influenced by that, it mixed a fascination for many
more things, all related, organs, synthesisers, looms, typeriters like my dad
used, computers, logic arrays, the things Babbage built... It's all related,
and to me all such machines are living, or a direct extension of life.

It's a slow Saturday night, but I'll stop there, it's strayed a bit from
antennas, though if (and only if) a good and specific reason arises, I'll say
why I think antennas of all things have gathered such an acrimonius history
in Usenet dicussions, but otherwise I'll keep that bit of philosphy to
myself. It's not a complex thought, just a deep and entirely untechnical
one...