Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
gareth wrote:
"Brian Reay" wrote in message ... It is nonsense, they can be no wave in the element due to it being a conductor. You seem to be unaware that a travelling wave around a wire is what causes the wave to move along the wire, and not the electrons inside, which only oscillate a very short distance about their mean. You seem to be unaware that current is the total, net movement of all the electrons in a wire, not just a single electron. He is confusing the I and V plots for waves. There is no confusion on my part. Perhaps you could explain where you think I am confused, for I had not mentioned the separated I and V waveforms. Yeah, right. Perhaps you are confused yourself, perhaps, by the current maximum at the centre of a dipole, for it is not a DC maximum but rises and falls in magnitude? Only a very confused individual would babble on about the instantaneous current or voltage. -- Jim Pennino |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Radiate Power Question ? | Antenna | |||
How much does a counterpoise radiate? | Antenna | |||
Antennae base | Homebrew |