| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sat, 01 Nov 2014 18:47:32 -0400, rickman wrote: I think you are confusing need with practicality. There is nothing to stop you from making a superconducting antenna. There just isn't a need for it unless you live in Gareth's world. Hmmm... wasn't that a movie? Gareth's World? (...) I believe there are rather cold temperatures in space. A superconducting antenna could be used there with *no* supporting "apparatus". You don't need to go to outer space to see cryogenic radios in operation. You can see space a lot better with a cryogenic radio. -- Jim Pennino |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
| Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
| Radiate Power Question ? | Antenna | |||
| How much does a counterpoise radiate? | Antenna | |||
| Antennae base | Homebrew | |||