Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
rickman wrote in :
I believe there are rather cold temperatures in space. A superconducting antenna could be used there with *no* supporting "apparatus". There's still such a thing as radiation resistance, I think, so it wouldn't stay cold even there. Given the size of a body, there's a limit to how fast it can get rid of heat at a given temperature.. I don't know the proper terminology for it though. Anyway, at low tenperature, the rate it can radiate heat is low, so it will quickly warm up out of low-temp superconducting state. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Radiate Power Question ? | Antenna | |||
How much does a counterpoise radiate? | Antenna | |||
Antennae base | Homebrew |