Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Stuckle wrote in news:m35chg$mlv$1@dont-
email.me: What would cause the superconductors to warm up? They have no resistance, so it wouldn't be from internal means. And kept shaded, there would be very little external heat applied. Not much, maybe. I just figured that their state would not be stable, that it would take very little, from any source, to heat them to the point where the problem started getting rapidly worse. Maybe it wouldn't be an issue if the superconductor were 'hot' enough. -196°C is 77°C above absolute zero, so maybe some of them will always stay cold enough with nothing but shade. Heat sources might be unexpected though. If a thin wire got hit my a micrometeorite, it would likely get stretched and heated pretty fast. So the question might be what kind of margins exist for safe operation. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Radiate Power Question ? | Antenna | |||
How much does a counterpoise radiate? | Antenna | |||
Antennae base | Homebrew |