Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
rickman wrote in :
The reason why cooling something gets harder as it approaches absolute zero is because the heat flow is proportional to the difference in temperature. Even if your pump is perfect and acts as if you put the thing being cooled in contact with a heat sink at 0 °K, the rate of heat flow decreases as that temperature delta diminishes. Ok, that helps. It's close to what I had in mind, though my reasoning may still be bad. For what it's worth... if a superconductor is very cold, needing to be so, then because there is no way to go below zero K, there are more things hotter, than colder, so they have more effect than the shaded space conditions. That balance might favour a need for forced cooling just to play safe in many cases, but I accept that isolation might be fairly easy to do, and I also accept that 77K is likely far enough above shaded space conditions that it gives a wide margin to prevent small leaks from nearby heat sources causing failure. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Reductio ad absurdum - short antennae do not radiate well | Antenna | |||
Radiate Power Question ? | Antenna | |||
How much does a counterpoise radiate? | Antenna | |||
Antennae base | Homebrew |