![]() |
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
|
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
wrote in message
... It is an illustration of **** poor wording. What is depicted is NOT an electromagnetic field, i.e radio waves. And there we have it, encapsulated so neatly by those words of Alexander Pope ... "A little learning is a dangerous thing Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring" |
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
gareth wrote:
wrote in message ... It is an illustration of **** poor wording. What is depicted is NOT an electromagnetic field, i.e radio waves. And there we have it, encapsulated so neatly by those words of Alexander Pope ... "A little learning is a dangerous thing Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring" What we have is yet more hot air from the resident gas bag who does not understand the difference between an electric field, a magnetic field and an electromagetic field nor an AC voltage and electromagnetic radiation. -- Jim Pennino |
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
wrote in message
... gareth wrote: wrote in message ... It is an illustration of **** poor wording. What is depicted is NOT an electromagnetic field, i.e radio waves. And there we have it, encapsulated so neatly by those words of Alexander Pope ... "A little learning is a dangerous thing Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring" What we have is yet more hot air from the resident gas bag who does not understand the difference between an electric field, a magnetic field and an electromagetic field nor an AC voltage and electromagnetic radiation. "A little learning is a dangerous thing Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring" QED |
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
wrote in message
... What we have is yet more hot air from the resident gas bag who does not understand the difference between an electric field, a magnetic field and an electromagetic field nor an AC voltage and electromagnetic radiation. Now I begin to understand where the boundaries of your knowledge lie, and why you present yourself as a redneck when you hit those boundaries. You are another to whom I exhort a study period leading to an understanding of Maxwell's Equations because ... 1. Whenever there is a changing electric field, there is also a changing magnetic field and hence an electromagnetic field. 2. Whenever there is a changing magnetic field, there is also a changing electric field and hence an electromagnetic field. That will suffice for the moment. Meanwhile, write out longhand 1000 times, "Jimp must not be cheeky to his teacher". Please be aware that there are two versions of Maxwell's Equations, one for in vacuo, and the other in a media, because a notorious Brit redneck has recently made a fool of himself in that respect. In conclusion, Old Chap, it is far better for the health of amateur radio in general, and this NG in particular for you to engage in gentlemanly discussion than it is to present yourself as a disruptive redneck. |
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
gareth wrote:
wrote in message ... What we have is yet more hot air from the resident gas bag who does not understand the difference between an electric field, a magnetic field and an electromagetic field nor an AC voltage and electromagnetic radiation. Now I begin to understand where the boundaries of your knowledge lie, and why you present yourself as a redneck when you hit those boundaries. You are another to whom I exhort a study period leading to an understanding of Maxwell's Equations because ... 1. Whenever there is a changing electric field, there is also a changing magnetic field and hence an electromagnetic field. Wrong; no electromagnetic field. If that were true one could create an electromagnetic field just by waving a battery around, and you can not do that. 2. Whenever there is a changing magnetic field, there is also a changing electric field and hence an electromagnetic field. Wrong; no electromagnetic field. If that were true one could create an electromagnetic field just by waving a magnet around, and you can not do that. That will suffice for the moment. Yes, that is quite enough babbling nonsense to prove to one and all you have no clue that an electric field, a magnetic field, and an electromagnetic field are three different things. An electromagnetic field does not form just because there is an electric field and a magnetic field in proximity. Meanwhile, write out longhand 1000 times, "Jimp must not be cheeky to his teacher". **** off and die, you long winded, babbling, gas bag. snip remaing gas bag babble -- Jim Pennino |
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
|
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
wrote in message
... **** off and die, you long winded, babbling, gas bag. As I suggested before, the reaction of an ignorant redneck. You behaved in the same manner towards me when I posted a reference in rra.homebrew about laying down etch resist using a 3D printer (the bit that interested me) by going on and on and on and on about the original article being about flexible PCB, when that was not relevant to my posts. Why do you behave in such a childish manner? Seriously, you need to get a foundation in Maxwell's Equations and not the source of your present beliefs which seem to owe more to Dr.Seuss than they do to any scientific knowledge. |
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
"Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message
. .. wrote in : **** off and die, you long winded, babbling, gas bag. Don't let him get to you.. You've done enough to leave a record, I've seen Usenet posts persist for years. Anyone who encounters this for the next ten years will also see your efforts to correct it. You don't need to put yourself through that now unless you really like the pain. Being ignorant yourself, and with a tirade of posts that are not at all relevant to amateur radio, you make the mistake of siding with your fellow in ignorance. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com