gareth wrote:
wrote in message
...
What we have is yet more hot air from the resident gas bag who does
not understand the difference between an electric field, a magnetic
field and an electromagetic field nor an AC voltage and electromagnetic
radiation.

Now I begin to understand where the boundaries of your knowledge lie, and
why
you present yourself as a redneck when you hit those boundaries.

You are another to whom I exhort a study period leading to an understanding
of Maxwell's Equations because ...

1. Whenever there is a changing electric field, there is also a changing
magnetic
field and hence an electromagnetic field.

Wrong; no electromagnetic field.

If that were true one could create an electromagnetic field just by
waving a battery around, and you can not do that.

2. Whenever there is a changing magnetic field, there is also a changing
electric
field and hence an electromagnetic field.

Wrong; no electromagnetic field.

If that were true one could create an electromagnetic field just by
waving a magnet around, and you can not do that.

That will suffice for the moment.

Yes, that is quite enough babbling nonsense to prove to one and all you
have no clue that an electric field, a magnetic field, and an
electromagnetic field are three different things.

An electromagnetic field does not form just because there is an electric
field and a magnetic field in proximity.

Meanwhile, write out longhand 1000 times,
"Jimp must not be cheeky to his teacher".

**** off and die, you long winded, babbling, gas bag.

snip remaing gas bag babble



--
Jim Pennino

wrote in :

**** off and die, you long winded, babbling, gas bag.


Don't let him get to you.. You've done enough to leave a record, I've seen
Usenet posts persist for years. Anyone who encounters this for the next ten
years will also see your efforts to correct it. You don't need to put
yourself through that now unless you really like the pain.

"Lostgallifreyan" wrote in message
. ..
wrote in :

**** off and die, you long winded, babbling, gas bag.


Don't let him get to you.. You've done enough to leave a record, I've seen
Usenet posts persist for years. Anyone who encounters this for the next
ten
years will also see your efforts to correct it. You don't need to put
yourself through that now unless you really like the pain.

Being ignorant yourself, and with a tirade of posts that are not at all
relevant
to amateur radio, you make the mistake of siding with your fellow in
ignorance.

wrote in message
...

**** off and die, you long winded, babbling, gas bag.

As I suggested before, the reaction of an ignorant redneck.

You behaved in the same manner towards me when I posted a reference
in rra.homebrew about laying down etch resist using a 3D printer (the bit
that interested me) by going on and on and on and on about the original
article being about flexible PCB, when that was not relevant to my posts.

Why do you behave in such a childish manner?

Seriously, you need to get a foundation in Maxwell's Equations and
not the source of your present beliefs which seem to owe more
to Dr.Seuss than they do to any scientific knowledge.

wrote:
gareth wrote:
(snipped for brevity(

**** off and die, you long winded, babbling, gas bag.

snip remaing gas bag babble



Gee, I wish I'd said that! Well said!

Irv VE6BP

On 11/3/2014 8:38 PM, Irv Finkleman VE6BP wrote:
wrote:
gareth wrote:
(snipped for brevity(

**** off and die, you long winded, babbling, gas bag.

snip remaing gas bag babble



Gee, I wish I'd said that! Well said!

It's never too late...

--

Rick

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
I've been hinting at that but he knows better ;-)
He seems to think Maxwell agrees with him, of course Maxwell's maths'
skills
were a bit more advanced. Even with a suitable clue he continued his
folly.
Having, I suspect, realised he was out of his depth he tried to bluff his
way out.
Being familiar with his tactics, I've just let him run, like playing a
fish. He is
already swimming in circles in a keep net, why worry about landing him.
;-)

Once again, Brian, Old Man, it is from you that the abuse originates
out-of-the-blue.

I suspect that this time it is because of your faux pas about Maxwell's
Equations, firstly
by your claim that they do not apply to all electrical phenomena, and
secondly the mistake
that you made when reading up on Google not to realise that there were some
non-zero
differentials in static fields when dealing with the version of the
equations for fields in media.

I did wonder how long it would be before there would be an attempt at a
smokescreen
by you after I tried to teach you about the subject, for it is noticeable
that in what
you have posted above there is no technical contribution, only an infantile
outburst.

As to your closing remarks, you repeatedly make snide comments about one who
is the
Chief Stirrer in these NG, and those remarks suggest that it is you,
although you haven't
realised yet that there has been no playing along, for I have been playing
the part
of the patient schoolteacher dealing with the unruly and disruptive infant
that you are.