Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Short antennae - a reprise
On 04/11/14 18:57, gareth wrote:
wrote in message ... The answer is because the radiation resistance is measured in milliohms and a matching network to match 50 Ohms to milliohms has huge resistive losses. Afraid you've just shot yourself in the foot, there, Old Chap, because the reason that the apparent radiation resistance is so low is because so little is radiated! I despair, and I don't think I'm alone in doing so. -- ;-) .. 73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint. .. http://turner-smith.co.uk .. Ubuntu 12.04 Thunderbirds are go. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. | Antenna | |||
Short antennae, et al | Antenna | |||
short antennae | Antenna | |||
The philosophy of short antennae | Antenna | |||
Short Antennae | Antenna |