LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 4th 14, 07:01 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 137
Default Short antennae - a reprise

On 04/11/14 18:57, gareth wrote:
wrote in message
...

The answer is because the radiation resistance is measured in milliohms
and a matching network to match 50 Ohms to milliohms has huge resistive
losses.


Afraid you've just shot yourself in the foot, there, Old Chap, because the
reason that the apparent radiation resistance is so low is because so little
is radiated!


I despair, and I don't think I'm alone in doing so.

--
;-)
..
73 de Frank Turner-Smith G3VKI - mine's a pint.
..
http://turner-smith.co.uk
..
Ubuntu 12.04
Thunderbirds are go.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The inefficiency of short antennae compared to long antennae, as previously discussed. gareth Antenna 119 February 24th 15 09:54 AM
Short antennae, et al gareth Antenna 17 November 3rd 14 05:27 PM
short antennae gareth Antenna 47 November 1st 14 12:46 PM
The philosophy of short antennae gareth Antenna 3 October 28th 14 06:02 PM
Short Antennae gareth Antenna 10 October 11th 14 02:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017