Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/5/2014 1:32 PM, rickman wrote:
On 11/5/2014 2:02 PM, wrote: On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 12:33:48 PM UTC-6, John S wrote: Can you tell us how big would it be? And what about the coil dimensions, losses? Can you do an EZNEC model so those of us who have the simulator can look at all the parameters/arguments? It can be any size one wants. The bigger the better of course.. What? Maybe you don't fully grasp the idea of a "short" antenna? ;-) Rickman, please. Is that the tact a Gentleman would use? It seems that your comment may be designed to invoke an ungentlemanly response. This is exactly the sort of response I was hoping to avoid. I beg you to be a bit more tactful. For example "Well, of course, but what do you, personally, consider is a short antenna?" |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/5/2014 3:21 PM, John S wrote:
On 11/5/2014 1:32 PM, rickman wrote: On 11/5/2014 2:02 PM, wrote: On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 12:33:48 PM UTC-6, John S wrote: Can you tell us how big would it be? And what about the coil dimensions, losses? Can you do an EZNEC model so those of us who have the simulator can look at all the parameters/arguments? It can be any size one wants. The bigger the better of course.. What? Maybe you don't fully grasp the idea of a "short" antenna? ;-) Rickman, please. Is that the tact a Gentleman would use? It seems that your comment may be designed to invoke an ungentlemanly response. This is exactly the sort of response I was hoping to avoid. I beg you to be a bit more tactful. Chill dude. Did you see the smiley? It was meant to be humorous. For example "Well, of course, but what do you, personally, consider is a short antenna?" Hey! Who are you calling short? -- Rick |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/5/2014 5:41 PM, rickman wrote:
On 11/5/2014 3:21 PM, John S wrote: On 11/5/2014 1:32 PM, rickman wrote: On 11/5/2014 2:02 PM, wrote: On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 12:33:48 PM UTC-6, John S wrote: Can you tell us how big would it be? And what about the coil dimensions, losses? Can you do an EZNEC model so those of us who have the simulator can look at all the parameters/arguments? It can be any size one wants. The bigger the better of course.. What? Maybe you don't fully grasp the idea of a "short" antenna? ;-) Rickman, please. Is that the tact a Gentleman would use? It seems that your comment may be designed to invoke an ungentlemanly response. This is exactly the sort of response I was hoping to avoid. I beg you to be a bit more tactful. Chill dude. Did you see the smiley? It was meant to be humorous. For example "Well, of course, but what do you, personally, consider is a short antenna?" Hey! Who are you calling short? ;-) -- Rick |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/5/2014 4:41 PM, rickman wrote:
On 11/5/2014 3:21 PM, John S wrote: On 11/5/2014 1:32 PM, rickman wrote: On 11/5/2014 2:02 PM, wrote: On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 12:33:48 PM UTC-6, John S wrote: Can you tell us how big would it be? And what about the coil dimensions, losses? Can you do an EZNEC model so those of us who have the simulator can look at all the parameters/arguments? It can be any size one wants. The bigger the better of course.. What? Maybe you don't fully grasp the idea of a "short" antenna? ;-) Rickman, please. Is that the tact a Gentleman would use? It seems that your comment may be designed to invoke an ungentlemanly response. This is exactly the sort of response I was hoping to avoid. I beg you to be a bit more tactful. Chill dude. Did you see the smiley? It was meant to be humorous. Sorry. I miss noticing those frequently. For example "Well, of course, but what do you, personally, consider is a short antenna?" Hey! Who are you calling short? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LF Antenna Design | Homebrew | |||
LF Antenna Design | Antenna | |||
New antenna design | Antenna | |||
Short 80m antenna, suggestions?? | Antenna | |||
Short lot 80 and possible 160 antenna suggestions | Antenna |