Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"gareth" wrote in message
... "John S" wrote in message ... So, it appears that doubling the length of a short antenna captures about 3.6 times the signal. And, therefore, by the reciprocity characteristic, the short antenna is an inefficient radiator. So, can I expect an apology from all the Yanks who badmouthed me in order to try to hide their own ignorance on the matter? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/11/2014 9:31 AM, gareth wrote:
"gareth" wrote in message ... "John S" wrote in message ... So, it appears that doubling the length of a short antenna captures about 3.6 times the signal. And, therefore, by the reciprocity characteristic, the short antenna is an inefficient radiator. So, can I expect an apology from all the Yanks who badmouthed me in order to try to hide their own ignorance on the matter? doubtful you are no matter other mistakes a foolish troll |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:47:36 +1000, atec77 wrote:
On 7/11/2014 9:31 AM, gareth wrote: "gareth" wrote in message ... "John S" wrote in message ... So, it appears that doubling the length of a short antenna captures about 3.6 times the signal. And, therefore, by the reciprocity characteristic, the short antenna is an inefficient radiator. So, can I expect an apology from all the Yanks who badmouthed me in order to try to hide their own ignorance on the matter? doubtful you are no matter other mistakes a foolish troll He's a deeply unpleasant, deliberately disruptive, dunce. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna & Tuner on 160M Question | Antenna | |||
160m antenna | Antenna | |||
Why did this work (160m antenna)? | Antenna | |||
Outbacker ML-130 160m antenna question | Antenna | |||
question about 160m Isotron Antenna | Antenna |