Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 6th 14, 11:31 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,382
Default A short 160M antenna

"gareth" wrote in message
...
"John S" wrote in message
...
So, it appears that doubling the length of a short antenna captures about
3.6 times the signal.


And, therefore, by the reciprocity characteristic, the short antenna is
an inefficient radiator.


So, can I expect an apology from all the Yanks who badmouthed me
in order to try to hide their own ignorance on the matter?



  #2   Report Post  
Old November 7th 14, 12:47 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2011
Posts: 14
Default A short 160M antenna

On 7/11/2014 9:31 AM, gareth wrote:
"gareth" wrote in message
...
"John S" wrote in message
...
So, it appears that doubling the length of a short antenna captures about
3.6 times the signal.


And, therefore, by the reciprocity characteristic, the short antenna is
an inefficient radiator.


So, can I expect an apology from all the Yanks who badmouthed me
in order to try to hide their own ignorance on the matter?



doubtful
you are no matter other mistakes a foolish troll
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 7th 14, 08:33 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2014
Posts: 14
Default A short 160M antenna

On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:47:36 +1000, atec77 wrote:

On 7/11/2014 9:31 AM, gareth wrote:
"gareth" wrote in message
...
"John S" wrote in message
...
So, it appears that doubling the length of a short antenna captures
about 3.6 times the signal.

And, therefore, by the reciprocity characteristic, the short antenna
is an inefficient radiator.


So, can I expect an apology from all the Yanks who badmouthed me in
order to try to hide their own ignorance on the matter?



doubtful
you are no matter other mistakes a foolish troll


He's a deeply unpleasant, deliberately disruptive, dunce.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Antenna & Tuner on 160M Question Bob D.[_2_] Antenna 1 March 23rd 09 08:57 PM
160m antenna jimg Antenna 2 February 7th 06 12:09 PM
Why did this work (160m antenna)? hasan schiers Antenna 7 February 1st 06 09:04 PM
Outbacker ML-130 160m antenna question Jeff L Antenna 4 December 20th 04 01:50 AM
question about 160m Isotron Antenna William E. Verge Antenna 4 February 17th 04 04:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017