Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:56:16 -0400, - XC - hath writ:
"Crazy George" wrote in message ... William: Look carefully at what you wrote. Couldn't you have achieved the same results by turning the RF gain down, or shortening your existing antenna? Noise down, signals down also? WWV gone? Hmmm. Suspicious. I'll answer for him, ...No and No. Receiving loops aren't about signal strength they're about improved Signal to Noise **Ratio**. And, receiving loops are about nulling out interfering signals. Deep nulls has a loop. Jonesy -- | Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux | Gunnison, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | OS/2 __ | 7,703' -- 2,345m | config.com | DM68mn SK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna | |||
Shielded Loop - Velocity Factor? | Antenna | |||
Snap-on choke hurts shielded loop | Antenna |