LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 13th 04, 04:42 PM
Allodoxaphobia
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 10:56:16 -0400, - XC - hath writ:

"Crazy George" wrote in message
...
William:

Look carefully at what you wrote. Couldn't you have achieved the same
results by turning the RF gain down, or shortening your existing antenna?
Noise down, signals down also? WWV gone? Hmmm. Suspicious.


I'll answer for him, ...No and No.
Receiving loops aren't about signal strength they're about improved Signal
to Noise **Ratio**.


And, receiving loops are about nulling out interfering signals.
Deep nulls has a loop.

Jonesy
--
| Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux
| Gunnison, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | OS/2 __
| 7,703' -- 2,345m | config.com | DM68mn SK
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna Al Antenna 6 October 28th 03 12:02 AM
Shielded Loop - Velocity Factor? Loopfan Antenna 4 July 16th 03 07:33 AM
Snap-on choke hurts shielded loop Loopfan Antenna 3 July 14th 03 08:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017