Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OH, for Pete's sake. Loops are sensitive to the H vector. Wires receive
the E vector. Most near field noise tends to be predominantly E field. But, that seems to only be effective up to 3 or 4 MHz, due to the wavelength factor, i. e. the near field shrinks as you go higher in frequency. Fully formed far field wavefronts of noise sources will be just like wanted signals, and unless some polarization difference is available, then directivity is the only way to improve S/N. Only in special circumstances can you see much improvement above 5 MHz due to near field/far field differentiation. But, my point was that no improvement in S/N was reported in the original post. Only a decrease of noise accompanied by a decrease in signal. No relative comparison offered. Are we supposed to *assume* that the signals went down due to time of day, while the noise went down because it is a loop? Maybe the opposite is true? Not enough data to prove either. -- Crazy George Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna | |||
Shielded Loop - Velocity Factor? | Antenna | |||
Snap-on choke hurts shielded loop | Antenna |