Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "GeorgeF" wrote in message ... F8BOE wrote: Hello, Just a simple dumb question: is it the "birdfeeder" that radiates or the coaxial cable used between the transceiver and the miraculous antenna? 73 de F8BOE Olivier ...-.- I belive its the two metal places, one above and one below the coil which are to form a capacitor. George I seem to recall an indepth analysis on the AntennEx site showing that it was the shield on the coax that did the majority of the radiating. A simple proof would be to change the coaxial feeder length or how it is physically run and look for VSWR changes. Dale W4OP |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I seem to recall an indepth analysis on the AntennEx site showing that it was the shield on the coax that did the majority of the radiating. A simple proof would be to change the coaxial feeder length or how it is physically run and look for VSWR changes. Dale W4OP Originally where I had the 40 Meter Isotron located I was using about a 50' coax run (RF-9913). I the moved the antenna to a different position and had to add about 25' more of coax. The additional coax caused SWR to jump from about 1.2:1 to 1.4:1. A quick returning of the "tuning rod" on the antenna brought it back to 1.2:1 Last night I was doing more playing with the 10/15/20 combo, was able to get the 20 meter size down to 1.2:1 and had about a 300 KHz bandwith to say under 2:1 SWR so I'm happy with that. But still can't get the 10 & 15 meters to do any better than 3:1. It possibly might be the location of the ant as its pretty close to some electical house wiring? George |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "Dale" == Dale Parfitt writes: [... GeorgeF asked about Isotrons ...] Dale I seem to recall an indepth analysis on the AntennEx site Dale showing that it was the shield on the coax that did the majority Dale of the radiating. A simple proof would be to change the coaxial Dale feeder length or how it is physically run and look for VSWR Dale changes. So if someone tells me about a crazy antenna that "just works" but which relies on the feedline being straight and not coiled, I should suspect it to be Isotron-like in design and effect? Dale Dale W4OP Jack. (figuring someone with field-strength meters could solve this) - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA+X4jGPFSfAB/ezgRAmcwAJ41qbL4qKwqFoQeT5X4DPow49nJUgCgvmmf /uBNEl/heAnZpn1VwHjoAQc= =8OqZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
FS: Connectors, Antennas, Meters, Mounts, etc. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? | Antenna |