Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 18th 04, 06:23 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bill Turner wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Make the "dipole" multiple wavelengths long. The major lobes will move
toward the ends of the "dipole". (I say "dipole" because it is then
actually electrically a polypole.)


Doesn't the word dipole just mean there are two halves of opposite
polarity? How do you figure "polypole" just because of multiple
wavelengths?


A *physical* dipole is two halves of opposite polarity.
An *electrical* dipole has two major radiation lobes. A multi-
wavelength physical dipole has more than two major radiation
lobes and is therefore not electrically a "dipole". It's
splitting hairs but I try to differentiate between the two
meanings by including the proper adjective.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 18th 04, 07:58 PM
Dave
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Bill Turner wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Make the "dipole" multiple wavelengths long. The major lobes will move
toward the ends of the "dipole". (I say "dipole" because it is then
actually electrically a polypole.)


Doesn't the word dipole just mean there are two halves of opposite
polarity? How do you figure "polypole" just because of multiple
wavelengths?


A *physical* dipole is two halves of opposite polarity.
An *electrical* dipole has two major radiation lobes. A multi-
wavelength physical dipole has more than two major radiation
lobes and is therefore not electrically a "dipole". It's
splitting hairs but I try to differentiate between the two
meanings by including the proper adjective.


don't worry about cecil, he just loves splitting hairs and using adjectives
that no one else would even think of applying. just give him a few more
messages and he'll be spouting on about some kind of reflection polymatrix
in his polypole or some such stuff... all when all the originator of the
thread wanted to know is if his dipole would work.

YES! it will work, stop reading this drivel and get on the air!


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Stacking Distance Question. More Information ab5mm Antenna 8 June 5th 04 08:18 AM
sma connector question Antenna 0 February 28th 04 01:44 AM
Stupid question G5RV Ken Bessler Antenna 17 January 9th 04 12:06 PM
Seperation question???? thanks [email protected] Antenna 0 October 7th 03 07:57 PM
Question about attenuators ... Doug McLaren Antenna 2 August 31st 03 04:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017