Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Harrison wrote:
. . . The FCC`s 120 radials of 1/4-wavelength has been efficient for medium waves in thousands of instances in all types of soil. It`s overkill in highly conductive soil, but regulations must be somewhat uniform for satisfactory enforcement. FCC`s rule is based on B,L,& E`s research. As I recall, B, L, & E worked at 3 MHz. We should always be careful in applying commercial broadcast standards to ham radio. For a broadcaster, the gain of a few percent in radiated field represents a measurable increase in the audience size, hence a significant increase in annual revenue, so it's worth a considerable one-time cost. For most amateurs, it represents only a fraction of a dB of signal strength, so isn't worthwhile. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Vertical Questions | Antenna | |||
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna | Antenna |