Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 21st 04, 07:28 PM
Roy Lewallen
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Harrison wrote:
. . .
The FCC`s 120 radials of 1/4-wavelength has been efficient for medium
waves in thousands of instances in all types of soil. It`s overkill in
highly conductive soil, but regulations must be somewhat uniform for
satisfactory enforcement. FCC`s rule is based on B,L,& E`s research. As
I recall, B, L, & E worked at 3 MHz.


We should always be careful in applying commercial broadcast standards
to ham radio. For a broadcaster, the gain of a few percent in radiated
field represents a measurable increase in the audience size, hence a
significant increase in annual revenue, so it's worth a considerable
one-time cost. For most amateurs, it represents only a fraction of a dB
of signal strength, so isn't worthwhile.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
Vertical Questions AA5QT Antenna 15 June 30th 04 07:00 PM
Distance to Link Coupling in a Loop Antenna Al Antenna 6 October 28th 03 12:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017