Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Spike wrote:
On 08/03/15 09:33, Jeff wrote: Spike wrote I think you are coming at this from the wrong view point. Perhaps the question that you should be asking is what take-off angles are required to produce maximum ground wave, and how do you maximize that for a MF mobile installation. I'm really after figures for the proportions of the RF power fed to that antenna, that finish up in whatever 'they' are called (the use of the well-known word 'waves' seem to upset people despite their having been used for the specifics I mentioned, for about 100 years). Yes, there is wide use of the word "waves", but not as you are using it. To answer your question, all you have to know is the frequency, antenna pattern, the current state of the ionosphere, ground conductivity, terrain roughness and the dielectric constant in the area in question. I'm aware that reconfiguring the set-up might affect these proportions, but I did refer the original query to a typical /M (mobile) set-up of a short rod antenna not connected to ground and operating over average conductivity in the MF/low-HF bands. Well, to start with, you get little to no surface wave propagation above about 3 MHz. For example, does 40% power the sky (redacted), another 40% power the space (redacted), and the other 20% power the surface (redacted)? Clearly, 100% of the RF power goes somewhere, and the various parts of it must add up to 100% - so what are the proportions? Once again, all you have to know is the frequency, antenna pattern, the current state of the ionosphere, ground conductivity, terrain roughness and the dielectric constant in the area in question. If the /M (mobile) set-up was changed to a /P (portable) one with a 5/8 lambda ground-mounted antenna, the sky (redacted) proportion would lower and the surface/space (redacted) would increase - but from what to what? I'm beginning to think that this topic is either so simple or so complex that most Amateurs have either forgotten it or have never heard of it. No, you simply do not understand how propagation works. First read all of this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_propagation Read the section on Modes very carefully. Follow the links under Modes and read them: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_wave http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skywave http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line-of-sight_propagation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sporadic_E_propagation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropospheric_propagation -- Jim Pennino |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Vertical Monopole Radiation Characteristics | Antenna | |||
Vertical radiation from horizontal dipole? | Antenna | |||
Vertical Radiation Pattern? | Antenna | |||
The Ka'ba in Mecca Emits Short-wave Radiation | Shortwave | |||
Cardiod radiation pattern - 70 cm phased vertical dipoles | Antenna |